Friday, July 23, 2021   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home »

Greenwald: FBI Thwarts its Own Terrorist Plot

29 November 2010 8 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

Recently a case regarding a 19 year old Somali-American accused of attempting to blow up a Christmas event in Oregon has garnered national attention. The arrest fits a familiar pattern in which individuals are encouraged, supported and financed by the FBI to detonate bombs. Did the FBI stay within their limits when pursuing the Somali-American, or did they cross over the boundary into entrapment?

Glenn Greenwald has an excellent piece that questions this arrest and highlights for the umpteenth time the motive behind these “attacks,” a motive that is obfuscated quite often by politicians, the media and anti-Muslim activists.

These individuals aren’t, (as the Robert Spencer’s of the world proclaim) randomly convinced to blow up things because of some religious prescription/motivation, they are motivated by “occupations” and aggression against Muslims and Muslim countries! (Note to the FBI: Spencer is not going to tell you that when he is training your gumshoe detectives)

Time and time again the statements of these misguided individuals speak towards the reality that“It’s the occupation stupid!” but the Cassandra cries of Glenn Greenwald and those like him are willfully ignored and marginalized and so the fear-mongering, exploitation and violence against innocents continues unabated.

The FBI successfully thwarts its own Terrorist plot


by Glenn Greenwald

The FBI is obviously quite pleased with itself over its arrest of a 19-year-old Somali-American, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, who — with months of encouragement, support and money from the FBI’s own undercover agents — allegedly attempted to detonate a bomb at a crowded Christmas event in Portland, Oregon.  Media accounts are almost uniformly trumpeting this event exactly as the FBI describes it.  Loyalists of both parties are doing the same, with Democratic Party commentators proclaiming that this proves how great and effective Democrats are at stopping The Evil Terrorists, while right-wing polemicists point to this arrest as yet more proof that those menacing Muslims sure are violent and dangerous.

What’s missing from all of these celebrations is an iota of questioning or skepticism.  All of the information about this episode — all of it — comes exclusively from an FBI affidavit filed in connection with a Criminal Complaint against Mohamud.  As shocking and upsetting as this may be to some, FBI claims are sometimes one-sided, unreliable and even untrue, especially when such claims — as here — are uncorroborated and unexamined.  That’s why we have what we call “trials” before assuming guilt or even before believing that we know what happened:  because the government doesn’t always tell the complete truth, because they often skew reality, because things often look much different once the accused is permitted to present his own facts and subject the government’s claims to scrutiny.  The FBI affidavit — as well as whatever its agents are whispering into the ears of reporters — contains only those facts the FBI chose to include, but omits the ones it chose to exclude.  And even the “facts” that are included are merely assertions at this point and thus may not be facts at all.

It may very well be that the FBI successfully and within legal limits arrested a dangerous criminal intent on carrying out a serious Terrorist plot that would have killed many innocent people, in which case they deserve praise.  Court-approved surveillance and use of undercover agents to infiltrate terrorist plots are legitimate tactics when used in accordance with the law.

But it may also just as easily be the case that the FBI – as they’ve done many times in the past — found some very young, impressionable, disaffected, hapless, aimless, inept loner; created a plot it then persuaded/manipulated/entrapped him to join, essentially turning him into a Terrorist; and then patted itself on the back once it arrested him for having thwarted a “Terrorist plot” which, from start to finish, was entirely the FBI’s own concoction.  Having stopped a plot which it itself manufactured, the FBI then publicly touts — and an uncritical media amplifies — its “success” to the world, thus proving both that domestic Terrorism from Muslims is a serious threat and the Government’s vast surveillance powers — current and future new ones — are necessary.

There are numerous claims here that merit further scrutiny and questioning. First, the FBI was monitoring the email communications of this American citizen on U.S. soil for months (at least) with what appears to be the flimsiest basis: namely, that he was in email communication with someone in Northwest Pakistan, “an area known to harbor terrorists” (para. 5 of the FBI Affidavit).  Is that enough to obtain court approval to eavesdrop on someone’s calls and emails?  I’m glad the FBI is only eavesdropping with court approval, if that’s true, but certainly more should be required for judicial authorization than that.  Communicating with someone in Northwest Pakistan is hardly reasonable grounds for suspicion.

Second, in order not to be found to have entrapped someone into committing a crime, law enforcement agents want to be able to prove that, in the 1992 words of the Supreme Court, the accused was “was independently predisposed to commit the crime for which he was arrested.”  To prove that, undercover agents are often careful to stress that the accused has multiple choices, and they then induce him into choosing with his own volition to commit the crime.  In this case, that was achieved by the undercover FBI agent’s allegedly advising Mohamud that there were at least five ways he could serve the cause of Islam (including by praying, studying engineering, raising funds to send overseas, or becoming “operational”), and Mohamud replied he wanted to “be operational” by using exploding a bomb (para. 35-37).

But strangely, while all other conversations with Mohamud which the FBI summarizes were (according to the affidavit) recorded by numerous recording devices, this conversation — the crucial one for negating Mohamud’s entrapment defense — was not.  That’s because, according to the FBI, the undercover agent ”was equipped with audio equipment to record the meeting.  However, due to technical problems, the meeting was not recorded“ (para. 37).

Thus, we have only the FBI’s word, and only its version, for what was said during this crucial — potentially dispositive — conversation.  Also strangely: the original New York Times article on this story described this conversation at some length and reported the fact that “that meeting was not recorded due to a technical difficulty,” but the final version omitted that, instead simply repeating the FBI’s story as though it were fact:  ”undercover agents in Mr. Mohamud’s case offered him several nonfatal ways to serve his cause, including mere prayer. But he told the agents he wanted to be ‘operational,’ and perhaps execute a car bombing.”

Third, there are ample facts that call into question whether Mohamud’s actions were driven by the FBI’s manipulation and pressure rather than his own predisposition to commit a crime.  In June, he attempted to fly to Alaska in order to work on a fishing job he obtained through a friend, but he was on the Government’s no-fly list.  That caused the FBI to question him at the airport and then bar him from flying to Alaska, and thus prevented him from earning income with this job (para. 25).  Having prevented him from working, the money the FBI then pumped him with — including almost $3,000 in cash for him to rent his own apartment (para. 61) — surely helped make him receptive to their suggestions and influence.  And every other step taken to perpetrate this plot — from planning its placement to assembling the materials to constructing the bomb — was all done at the FBI’s behest and with its indispensable support and direction.

It’s impossible to conceive of Mohamud having achieved anything on his own.  Before being ensnared by the FBI, the only tangible action he had taken was to write three articles on “fitness and jihad” for the online magazine Jihad Recollections.  At least based on what is known, he had no history of violence, no apparent criminal record, had never been to a training camp in Afghanistan, Pakistan or anywhere else, and — before meeting the FBI — had never taken a single step toward harming anyone.  Does that sound like some menacing sleeper Terrorist to you?

Finally, there is, as usual, no discussion whatsoever in media accounts of motive.  There are several statements attributed to Mohamud by the Affidavit that should be repellent to any decent person, including complete apathy — even delight — at the prospect that this bomb would kill innocent people, including children.  What would drive a 19-year-old American citizen — living in the U.S. since the age of 3 — to that level of sociopathic indifference?   He explained it himself in several passages quoted by the FBI, and — if it weren’t for the virtual media blackout of this issue — this line of reasoning would be extremely familiar to Americans by now (para. 45):

Undercover FBI Agent:  You know there’s gonna be a lot of children there?

Mohamud:  Yeah, I know, that’s what I’m looking for.

Undercover FBI Agent:  For kids?

Mohamud:  No, just for, in general a huge mass that will, like for them you know to be attacked in their own element with their families celebrating the holidays.  And then for later to be saying, this was them for you to refrain from killing our children, women . . . . so when they hear all these families were killed in such a city, they’ll say you know what your actions, you know they will stop, you know.  And it’s not fair that they should do that to people and not feeling it.

And here’s what he allegedly said in a video he made shortly before he thought he would be detonating the bomb (para. 80):

We hear the same exact thing over and over and over from accused Terrorists — that they are attempting to carry out plots in retaliation for past and ongoing American violence against Muslim civilians and to deter such future acts.  Here we find one of the great mysteries in American political culture:  that the U.S. Government dispatches its military all over the world — invading, occupying, and bombing multiple Muslim countries — torturing them, imprisoning them without charges, shooting them up at checkpoints, sending remote-controlled drones to explode their homes, imposing sanctions that starve hundreds of thousands of children to death  — and Americans are then baffled when some Muslims — an amazingly small percentage — harbor anger and vengeance toward them and want to return the violence.   And here we also find the greatest myth in American political discourse:  that engaging in all of that military aggression somehow constitutes Staying Safe and combating Terrorism — rather than doing more than any single other cause to provoke, sustain and fuel Terrorism.

UPDATE:  A very similar thing happened last month when the FBI announced that it had arrested someone who was planning to bomb the DC Metro system when, in reality, “the only plotting he did was in response to instructions from federal agents he thought were accomplices.”  That concocted FBI plot then led to the Metro Police announcing a new policy of random searches of passengers’ bags.

Meanwhile, in Oregon, the mosque sometimes attended by Mohamud wasvictimized today by arson.  So the FBI did not stop any actual Terrorist plots, but they may have helped inspire one.

Original post: Greenwald: FBI Thwarts its Own Terrorist Plot


  1. Regardless of whether the FBI overstepped its bounds into entrapment, the vital concern here is whether the young man willingly bought into it. If his heart was into murdering our people, not knowing he was dancing with the feds, then let him have it!

    Normally I am very concerned about protecting unpopular minorities because of my bitter memory of the mistreatment of Japanese-Americans during WW Two. But to speak of a wise sting operation as if to blame the FBI and say it “thwarted its own terror plot” sounds as if you seek to blame it on them.

    As a naturalized —- and fiercely loyal — US citizen who jump through every legal hoop finally to become an American, it enrages me to see another adopted American reward this country with such murderous ingratitude. Look, I don’t give a damn if the FBI failed to dot or cross a few i’s or t’s. If the young man intended harm, my only regret is that we can’t feed the swine to a great white shark.

  2. I am sorry to blow up people who celebrate the birth of prophet is not OK. These people are innocent. They are not responsible for what their government does any more than you can say Iranians are responsible for what their government does or Saudi’s or any other government. Killing innocent people is against Islam and not OK

  3. Regardless of what the FBI did, HE CHOSE TO FOLLOW THEM. What if they were not FBI and were Al-Qaeda…the bomb would have gone off.

    I as a Muslim think the FBI should do MORE SUCH BAITING in order to see how many more of these Wahabi inspired nut cases they can catch.

  4. @Vivek,
    Oh yes, the eager beaver desi shows his “loyalty” by being a far right moron(and possibly a BJP Hindu fanatic with his own agenda against Muslims). We don’t need “fiercely loyal” opportunists like you, we need intelligent citizens who ask tough questions.
    The Somali idiot was a nobody who was groomed for several months and actively aided by the FBI in attempting to carry out such an attack. If you supply explosives you’re an accomplish.

    @Abdul Rahim,

    You sir are an idiot. You support the FBI, an organization with a long history of of criminal activity. Leonard Peltier knows how the FBI operate and is in prison because of it. As I.f. Stone said ALL GOVERNMENTS LIE and the history of the FBI since the days of J.E. Hoover is well known to do what they think is necessary to get “their” men/women. Catch somebody in the act or set them up to catch them, does the public know or even care? They are doing their job as the public is led to believe. The FBI has a dark side more than anybody knows. Ever heard of cointel pro, genius? Create terror to fight it? Yeah, sounds like OJ looking for Nicole’s killer.

  5. @DrM: Calling other people degrading names just because you don’t like their views betrays your own feeble logic. I am the first one to admit that in past ages of US history the FBI was used for wrongful activities. J. Edgar Hoover harassed Martin Luther King. Leonard Peltier may have been screwed. The COINTELPRO was a disgrace.

    But the point is that in those days America itself was a fascist country toward minorities and white radicals. Which is why I really don’t care if Obama ws friendly with former Weathermen. But with a black president today, whose own father was a black Muslim, you say the FBI is setting up Muslims?

    You just can’t please everyone, not that I want to anyway. While right-wingers say Obama is a crypto-Muslim, you say the FBI is framing them. As for the BJ and Hindutva, F–K them! I despise them more than you know.

  6. @Vivek Golikeri,

    “I am the first one to admit that in past ages of US history the FBI was used for wrongful activities. J. Edgar Hoover harassed Martin Luther King. Leonard Peltier may have been screwed. The COINTELPRO was a disgrace.”

    Oh really? Yet you dismiss skepticism and corruption in this particular case. Nice try, no cigar.

    “But the point is that in those days America itself was a fascist country toward minorities and white radicals.”

    Actually the US is more of a fascist state TODAY with no Habeas corpus, widespread abuse of civil liberties(not just Muslims, but antiwar activists as well), warrant less wire tapping, secret detention and rendition etc.

    “But with a black president today, whose own father was a black Muslim, you say the FBI is setting up Muslims?”

    You’re talking nonsense. Obama’s being black and his father being a Muslim has what to do with the criminal behavior of the FBI? Absolutely NOTHING! If I were to list the number of phony fishing expeditions by the FBI in the last 10 years against the Muslim community I’d be hear all day.
    Here’s a cliff note version :

    What say you now?

  7. Remember Bush’s November 21, 2001 words: “If you harbor terrorists, you are terrorists. If you train or arm a terrorist, you are a terrorist. If you feed a terrorist or fund a terrorist, you’re a terrorist, and you will be held accountable.” What Bush didn’t say was “this doesn’t refer to ‘our terrorists.'”

    It is the height of hypocrisy to talk about fighting terrorism while harbouring men who are wanted for or helping to destroy passenger airplanes.

    Luis Clemente Faustino Posada Carriles, was harboured from the 1976 Cubana airline bombing to recent terrorist attacks and plots.

    But, just as the Bush family has been directly tied to the Bin Laden family, so, too, have they been tied to Posada Carriles. Just as the Bin Ladens were the only planes in American airspace to leave the country after 9/11, so too is Luis Posada Carriles being shuffled through the system to fall out the other side completely free and anonymous.

    “The terrorists Posada Carriles, and Osama bin Laden have become symbols of the US methods of hemispheric domination and its double standard: on the one hand, they declare a global war on terrorism and, on the other, they use it.”

    The entire War on Terror is an evil and fraudulent enterprise. U.S. government officials use terrorism to suit their own ends all the time, and yet, they expect us to believe that their cause to “eradicate international terrorism” is genuine? How can people be fooled by such hypocritical monsters?

    Will President Obama extradite Luis Clemente Faustino Posada Carriles, to Venezuela and risk that he will reveal the secrets of four decades of Bush’s involvement in organising a facist international, or will President Obama protect him and stand exposed before the world as another protector of an international terrorist apparatus. The U.S. government knows how many crimes it has committed, hence all the continued secrecy by the Obama administration. Everything in Washington stinks.

    Luis Clemente Faustino Posada Carriles makes a mockery of the United States, and all that the USA claims to stand for. It is time to end the mockery of justice, peace, and order that has existed for too long.


    Why does this terrorist Posada Carriles get such protection?

  8. The whole trouble with debate is that too many posters tend to go either to one extreme or to the other. Sure, America and the West have done their share of wrong, but which country has not? Ever heard of female genital mutilation in African countries? Or the chopping of hands for petty theft under Sharia law? Some liberals talk as if injustice is uniquely or specially western —– and then they line up to migrate here!

    Anybody who thinks that bigotry or oppression are entirely whitey’s or honky’s fault is a bloody idiot who needs his head examined. Try living in Tehran and criticizing their regime the way people speak against our government here. See what happens!

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>