Friday, December 9, 2016   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » Loonwatch.com

Abhijit Pandya:UKIP Candidate Supports Wilders

28 April 2011 Loonwatch.com 9 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

Abhijit Pandya

Abhijit Pandya:UKIP Candidate Supports Wilders

Lovely lookin’ fella’ isn’t he? Maybe if he dyes his hair using peroxide he can try to be the British version of Geert Wilders?

If he wasn’t so Brown he’d fit right in with the BNP. I wonder how the EDL folks who want “British to be about British” feel about this lad? Anybody will do who can save us from the dreaded  ”Muslamic ray guns.”

UKIP by-election candidate backs Geert Wilders, says Islam is ‘morally flawed and degenerate’

Abhijit Pandya, an Indian-origin candidate for the Leicester South byelection, has sparked fury by making critical remarks about Islam in his blog less than a week before the May 5 elections.

Pandya, 31, is the candidate for the UK Independence Party, which is opposed to Britain’s membership of the European Union.

On his blog, Pandya called Islam “morally flawed and degenerate” and said he backed Geert Wilders, a controversial Dutch politician who allegedly called Islam a retarded ideology.

He wrote: “A theological system that fundamentally encourages discrimination between those who believe it and those who don’t, treating the latter as second-class citizens, is backward. A system that treats women as slaves without chains is morally flawed and degenerate.

“Cultural practices in many parts of the world which include child marriages and the death penalty for practising homosexuality are reminders that man is capable of going back to the dark ages very quickly.”

He goes on to ask: “Why should Britain, the country that fathered the modern world, put up with this, as Wilder’s [sic] put it, ‘retarded ideology’.”

Pandya wrote: “Islamic culture inherently rejects the Western way of life, more specifically the Protestant work ethic that has successfully built the economies of the West.

“It is also fundamentally socially intolerant, closing itself off to the rest of society and local communities and forming ghettos that are economically dysfunctional and ethically espouse, perhaps without realising it, intolerance that undermines both social and human capital”.

Deccan Herald, 27 April 2011

See also Leicester Mercury, 27 April 2011

Share/Bookmark




9 Comments »

  1. Here its called “Christianity”, And the ghettos they make are inbred trailer parks. In another place its “Judaism”, where they encourage raping muslim women. In another land far away, its called “Hinduism” where the people worship 30 headed gods that encourage destruction.
    Look, you can pick and choose the negative aspects of ANY religion. Just because a few degenerates ruin it for everyone else,it does not account for everyone else.Don’t use a single group whom encourage terrible things to justify your own hatred and bigotry.

  2. Now it is stupid indian who left to say things about islam

  3. lol….i’m not familair with what this guy has said. but doesn’t islam call for non-muslims to pay “the poor-rate”. does not the koran call for a different punishment for “killing a beleiver” from the punishishment for “killing a non-beleiever”? is not the punishment for a (female whom has converted to islam)slave who commites adultery, different that a muslim woman who commits adultery? islam is inheritantly two tiered in it’s law.

    gabe,

    wow your tolerance is a shining example of “the religion of peace” to the world.

    modh,

    not sure if that’s a typo…

  4. Well, here are not many comments. But I’d like to reply to Mike. Listen Sir, this Indian fellow is calling Muslims this or that and getting pretty much support. So, why don’t you call him intolerant? Think about any Muslim calling Israel such things: what would you do to that fellow? If Islam is so much women-hating, how can women have the huge rights on the properties of their fathers and after marriage, of their husbands, which is totally absent and opposed to in Hinduism? Why is it said in Islam that the children’s paradise is beneath their mothers’ feet (Sunnan-e-Naasaa’i, Haadis-3106)? Why is it said in Islam that when parents pray to the Almighty for the good of their children, then the mother’s prayer is three times appealing to the Almighty than that of the father? Remember, when witch hunt was a common practice against women in Europe and later in the new worlds, Muslim women never faced such cruelty.

    Respected Mike, I am not an apologist for Islam. In fact, I rarely follow my own religion and whenever I am in distress, I blame the Almighty which is a very wrong thing. But I can’t, in fact, very few can, stand any disparagement when it is about their respective faiths.

    Muslims ruled Iberia for 781 years. See the condition there: that area is devoid of Muslims as you allege except for the fact through recent immigration. Ottomans ruled a big portion of Europe for more than 450 years; except for Turkey and Albania, do you see substantial Muslim populace? Muslims ruled India from 711-1757 whereas India still remains the largest Hindu populated state on earth. Why? Could n’t the Muslims convert each and every non-Muslim in the aforementioned lands to Islam when they were the absolute rulers? Pole tax was a custom in the Persian and Byzantine Empires. The Muslim system is merely different. When the pole tax in Muslim system is paid, the non-Muslims are exempted from military service which is mandatory for all Muslims. And let me remind you four facts: in the land occupied and ruled by Muslims, there were many non-Muslims who held many honourable positions. But except for Arab courtiers in the Kingdom of Roger of Sicily, there were virtually any Muslim population, let alone important position holders. 2)When Saladin captured Jerusalem, he freed all the crusaders and the civilian Franks living in those areas. But before that,when the crusaders entered Jerusalem, they murdered all Muslims, Jews and Eastern Orthodox Christians therein. 3)When Jews were being butchered in the Iberian inquisition, an Ottoman Sultan rescued them, brought them into his empire and settled them throughout the realm. 4) Another Ottoman Sultan sent relief ships to the Irish port of Drogheda when the Irish were facing a devastating famine and also, mass persecution from their “English/British” rulers.

    I wait for your reply.

  5. kalu shah,

    he is intolerant, no doubt about it. where did i say he wasn’t? or even imply it? as for muslims saying what about israel? sorry i don’t follow your point. muslims say israel treats its arab minority as second class citizens all the time. i wouldn’t do any thing to “that fellow”. i’m 100% for free speech. call the jews anything you want, i won’t do anything to you. where did hinduism come from? sorry i know very little about hindus other than they believe in reincarnation and used to have a caste system. which i hope the caste system would not be toleranted in the west. (i think it’s been outlawed in india even) as for women’s inheritance rights, i believe the laws of modern countries shouldn’t take someone’s sex into account. i do beleive the idea that men are the “maintainers” of women (perhap somewhat like this guys idea of slaves without chains) shows some backwardness and that we should be moving towards equality for all. i don’t think it is “slavery” but i think it leads to women being held in a perpetual state of childhood. (see non-western muslims throughout the world) muhammad may have greatly improved the lot of women in 6th centry arabia, but i do not find the koran to be the book of laws we should follow today. there is no way we should impose the caste system and of course the bible is also outdated and i oppose judeo-christian law in america. we are a declared secular state and we should stay that way. do draw somethings from the abrahamic traditions but none should made offical law and much within all of them should be outlawed or not tolerated. (slavery, stoning, lashing, ambutations, disallowing homosexuallity, usury, etc.)

    as for your history lesson, thank you very much i’ll look into it. not familiar with your 4 examples. i do think your “Muslims ruled Iberia for 781 years”, is not totally correct. the last 259 years muslims were down to a small enclave, granada and a couple of out lying villages. anyways more to follow but the lightning are coming on and i have to get to the bar. hope to hear from you soon.

  6. Kalu Shah,

    sorry for my delay. and it looks like i skipped right over your second paragraph. “Respected Mike, I am not an apologist for Islam. In fact, I rarely follow my own religion and whenever I am in distress, I blame the Almighty which is a very wrong thing. But I can’t, in fact, very few can, stand any disparagement when it is about their respective faiths.” as for blaming your own god, i guess that is between you and your maker. as for acceptance of “disparagement” of one’s religion, you should google piss christ. also i personally would hold the american flag and it’s symbolism of the constitution higher than any religion. yet i would be perfectly happy to stand by as you “disparage” the flag or the constitution. have you ever hear of the amish? how about the mennonites? they will not only stand by as you dispagarage their religion but they will let you kill them.

    it’s getting late and i have to be in orlando in the morning, hope to have your input soon. i promise you i will research your one through 4 history.

    sorry i meant to say “we” do draw – and none should “be” made offical law in – the last sentence of my first post.

  7. kalu shah,

    please read this wiki page and tell me were it is wrong. (i don’twant tjo read misinformation) i kmow some people don’t like wiki because it’s “made up”. but i know sereval code writters who have tried to post things about their programs and have had them removed within 24 hours due to inability to independently confirm the info.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saladin

  8. kalu shah,

    sorry i took your word on face value but it now seems (having now read only some of this wiki page (above) on salidin) less than crediable to me. i will discontinue my research until you can put forth some concrete evidence of your claims.

    please tell me where these pages are wrong as well???

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Muslim_presence_in_the_Iberian_peninsula

  9. kalu shah,

    u there? i used to have alot of time 4 this, but i’m getting pretty busy these days. don’t want to waste my time if u have no idea what ur talkimg about?????

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>