Friday, April 16, 2021   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home »

A Crazed and Unstable Pamela Geller Bad-Mouths Victims of Oslo Terrorist Attack

1 August 2011 14 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

A Crazed and Unstable Pamela Geller Bad-Mouths Victims of Oslo Terrorist Attack

Anders Behring Breivik, the self-confessed Norwegian terrorist who killed over seventy-five innocent civilians, was a huge fan of anti-Muslim bloggers such as Jihad Watch‘s Robert Spencer and Atlas Shrug‘s Pamela Geller.  In fact, Breivik cited Robert Spencer and Jihad Watch dozens upon dozens of times in his manifesto.

Meanwhile, Pamela Geller reproduced an “email from Norway” that sounds like it came from Breivik (or somebody linked to him)–an email with an ominous warning:

We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast.

Geller specifically stated that she hid the identity of the emailer in order to prevent his arrest or prosecution.  After the Oslo terrorist attack, Geller had the same theory we did: the “email from Norway” sounds like it could be from Anders Behring Breivik.  And so, Geller stealthily removed the offensive line (about stockpiling weapons) from the “email from Norway.”  The question we asked yesterday was: could Pamela Geller have prevented the Oslo bloodbath by reporting the Norwegian emailer to authorities?

When news of the terrorist attack broke, the mainstream media–along with the anti-Muslim blogosphere including Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller–quickly blamed Muslims.  They called it “Norway’s 9/11” and stressed that it was the “worst terrorist attack in Norwegian history.”

But when it was revealed that the actual perpetrator was a white, blond and blue-eyed Christian–and an anti-Muslim right-winger to boot–then suddenly their tone quickly changed.  When it became known that the terrorist was in fact one of their own fans, suddenly they called for nuance and discretion: don’t rush to judgment, they implored.

Robert Spencer wrote an article entitled “The Blame Game,” whining that people were unjustly linking the terrorist to “counter-jihadists” like himself.  Funny how Spencer makes a living off of six degrees of association when it comes to Muslims, but suddenly cries foul when he is on the receiving end.

In that article, Spencer argues that it simply doesn’t make sense to link Breivik to the “counter-jihad movement.”  Fumed an irate Spencer (emphasis is ours):

1. Freedom fighters preach free speech, freedom of conscience and equality of rights for all people, against Sharia and Islamic supremacism that denies those rights, advocating only legal means of protest and dissent.

2. Some nutcase who allegedly expressed allegiance with the freedom fighters kills people, none of whom are preaching Sharia or Islamic supremacism.

3. Media assumes that #1 caused #2 and blames freedom fighters.

We had issued a response to this article, pointing out that Breivik was targeting people deemed to be “jihad-enablers:”

The obvious problem with Spencer’s logic is that it does not include his and other anti-Muslim loons’ consistent denunciations of “leftists” as jihad-enablers. This is a key tenant of the so-called anti-jihadist movement. They hate the left, or more specifically, anyone who treats Muslims with a smidgen of fairness and tolerance. Spencer and Geller consistently and constantly portray the left as those who would sell out the West to the scary Mooslems. Spencer’s hate site Jihad Watch is filled with posts denouncing the “Leftist/Jihadist alliance,” warning his readers of how the left will happily allow the Mooslem hordes to overthrow the West and “dhimmify” its population.

Breivik adopted this view of the left.  Paul Woodward notes that Breivik argued “that cultural conservatives should not identify their main opponents as Jihadists, but instead should focus their attention on those he regards as the ‘facilitators’ of Jihadists, namely, the proponents of multiculturalism.” It was these liberals and “multi-culturalists” that were the target of his rampage.

If a Neo-Nazi targeted and killed white people, this doesn’t mean that his killings weren’t related to his Neo-Nazi ideology if the targets were “race traitors” (white people who married black people, etc.).  Similarly, Anders Breivik was targeting non-Muslims who were “jihad-enablers” or “facilitators of the jihad.” (For the record, LoonWatch itself and other “leftist websites” have been accused of this.)

Proof that this was indeed the case can be found in the fact that Anders Breivik chose Utøya island as the target of his terrorist attack.  The island is owned by the Workers’ Youth League, the youth wing of the Labour Party, which is affiliated with Socialist International.  Apparently they were also sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.  These were left-leaning people who were targeted by Breivik, who in his mind were not only were socialists but jihad-enablers!

The Oslo terrorist chose to attack during the youth summer camp, which explains why an overwhelming majority of his victims were teenagers.  To make his attack even more grotesque, Breivik dressed up as a police officer, fooling children into coming out of hiding by claiming he was there to help them–only to shoot them when they did come out.

This was a truly heinous act.  Instead of mourning the dead, Pamela Geller–Breivik’s “spiritual benefactor”–is now bad-mouthing the innocent dead.  She calls the victims of the terrorist attack “anti-semites,” arguing that the summer camp is an “antisemitic indoctrination center” where they play “antisemitic war games.”  Blares the insane and lunatical Pamela Geller:

Utoya Island is a Communist/Socialist campground, and they clearly had a pro-Islamic agenda.

Aha! So, Pamela Geller’s comrade-in-arms Robert Spencer was just blowing smoke when he claimed that Breivik’s choice of victims just didn’t jive with the “counter-jihadist” ideology.  In reality, these dirty communists/socialists “had a pro-Islamic agenda.”  They were communists and pro-Islamists–that’s a two-for-one bag of hate for right-wingers.

And just like any good right-winger, Geller transitions swiftly between Communist references and Nazi/Hitler references, likening the victims to Hitler youth:

Glen Beck was not far off when he compared it to the Hitlerjugend or Young Pioneers.

The Young Pioneers was the youth organization for the Soviet Union, once again exhibiting how crazy right-wingers like Pamela Geller can move from Islamists to Nazis to Communism all in one breath.

More disgustingly, Pamela Geller mockingly and sarcastically refers to the young kids (who were the victims of the Oslo attack) as “little dearies:”

I saw at least one article that had photos of previous summers with the little dearies and their handlers assembling Israel-bashing displays.

Then she mentions something about “red diaper[s]” (wtf?)–I guess a reference to raising kids as communists.

And then we have Pamela Geller coming dangerously close to justifying the shooting, saying:

Breivik was targeting the future leaders of the party responsible for flooding Norway with Muslims who refuse to assimilate, who commit major violence against Norwegian natives, including violent gang rapes, with impunity, and who live on the dole… all done without the consent of the Norwegians.

Don’t you get it?  Anders Breivik killed people who were enabling violent gang rapes!  He killed rape-enablers!  Is that even a crime?  Shouldn’t he get a medal for that?

Can anyone imagine the reaction had Norwegians (or Muslims!) mocked the victims of 9/11 in this way?


  1. Horrible woman…

  2. [2.230] So if he divorces her she shall not be lawful to him afterwards until she marries another husband; then if he divorces her there is no blame on them both if they return to each other (by marriage), if they think that they can keep within the limits of Allah, and these are the limits of Allah which He makes clear for a people who know.
    [2.231] And when you divorce women and they reach their prescribed time, then either retain them in good fellowship or set them free with liberality, and do not retain them for injury, so that you exceed the limits, and whoever does this, he indeed is unjust to his own soul; and do not take Allah’s communications for a mockery, and remember the favor of Allah upon you, and that which He has revealed to you of the Book and the Wisdom, admonishing you thereby; and be careful (of your duty to) Allah, and know that Allah is the Knower of all things.
    [2.232] And when you have divorced women and they have ended– their term (of waiting), then do not prevent them from marrying their husbands when they agree among themselves in a lawful manner; with this is admonished he among you who believes in Allah and the last day, this is more profitable and purer for you; and Allah knows while you do not know.
    [2.233] And the mothers should suckle their children for two whole years for him who desires to make complete the time of suckling; and their maintenance and their clothing must be– borne by the father according to usage; no soul shall have imposed upon it a duty but to the extent of its capacity; neither shall a mother be made to suffer harm on account of her child, nor a father on account of his child, and a similar duty (devolves) on the (father’s) heir, but if both desire weaning by mutual consent and counsel, there is no blame on them, and if you wish to engage a wet-nurse for your children, there is no blame on you so long as you pay what you promised for according to usage; and be careful of (your duty to) Allah and know that Allah sees what you do.
    [2.234] And (as for) those of you who die and leave wives behind, they should keep themselves in waiting for four months and ten days; then when they have fully attained their term, there is no blame on you for what they do for themselves in a lawful manner; and Allah is aware of what you do.
    [2.235] And there is no blame on you respecting that which you speak indirectly in the asking of (such) women in marriage or keep (the proposal) concealed within your minds; Allah knows that you win mention them, but do not give them a promise in secret unless you speak in a lawful manner, and do not confirm the marriage tie until the writing is fulfilled, and know that Allah knows what is in your minds, therefore beware of Him, and know that Allah is Forgiving, Forbearing.
    [2.236] There is no blame on you if you divorce women when you have not touched them or appointed for them a portion, and make provision for them, the wealthy according to his means and the straitened in circumstances according to his means, a provision according to usage; (this is) a duty on the doers of good (to others).

  3. ^ uh?

    Also, Pamela Geller is an idiot, I think we know this. These people are very dangerous, of course.

  4. Of course she’s unstable! Who the HELL would bad mouth helpless teens that were butchered with explosive ammunition at as summer camp?!

    And – why hasn’t the FBI knocked at least once on her door?

  5. hey mike have something on topic to say instead of random koran verses?


  7. To all reading and replying to mikey’s posts: I’ve come to learn that it’s best to ignore his postings. He cuts-n-pastes from the Holy Qur’an and, so far, what he posts has no relevance to the articles written here.

    I’d L♥VE to see Pam Geller to be brought up on charges of conspiracy! That is an excellent question! She had some prior knowledge of some dud claiming to be stockpiling weapons in advance of the attack. Had this mystery person been threatening any Zionists or anti-Muslims, she would have immediately forwarded that e-mail to the appropriate and inappropriate authorities…..with name and e-mail address included! But after it was learned that the Christian terrorist was a fanatic of hers and fellow liar Robert Spencer, they back-peddled and she removed the “stockpiling” reference from her blog.

    What if a Muslim or one sympathetic to law-abiding Muslims had such a blog and received such a warning, in-advance, of the 9/11 attacks? What would she and Spencer have written about them once it was determined that this person possibly could have helped to avert such an attack? They wouldn’t be the “darlings” of the 9/11 families as they are now….!!

    And, by the way, my saying “Christian terrorist” is tongue-in-cheek. I know that the religion of Christianity does not promote the killing of innocent people any more than the religion of Islam doesn’t. But for far too long, those who write the headlines have indicted the person’s or persons’ religion if that person or persons are learned to be “Muslims“, but if the person or persons are not Muslims, their faith is not even mentioned and they are indicted as individuals.

    I’ve stated before and I’ll state again: if the terrorists of 9/11 ill-repute had been living a life of Islam and patterned their actions based on the Holy Qur’an & Hadith (not some crazed politically-motivated agenda), 9/11/01 would be another normal day in world history and there would not have been any such attack.

    To the terrorists/potential terrorist: STOP USING MY FAITH, ISLAM, AS A SHIELD TO COVER YOUR FILTH & MISDEEDS!! Grow some gonads and cite the political movement you represent instead as the reason you’re committing your crime against humanity!

  8. LOL..This pathetic, unstable loonatic remains me of the pagan leader Abu-Jahl!! during the Prophet(s.a.w) time….Salam

  9. I think the Norwegians are smart enough not to get mixed up in the emotional garbage that Spencer and Geller spew in this nation. Those two are definitely loons and sociopaths. What concerns me, however, is if Geller is withholding evidence of other right-wing terrorist cells then she ought to be brought in for questioning.

  10. to mike i think it will be better enough to stay on topic misquoting and picking of holy quran verses fro hate sites wont do you good……..its funny how you may think you know but you know nothing….

  11. hey all,

    like i’ve said several times now. sorry for the confusion. these verses aren’t random, they are in order. no one’s managed to notice that? i once said, why don’t we all read the koran together. so i post 7 verses at a time, 8 once when i have time. plus sahra told me it is helping her to be a better muslim, because she sees them and then picks up her koran and kisses it and reads it. anyways i’ll put up a disclaimer from now on. would something like this be acceptable to all:

    DISCLAIMER: (next 7 verses) i’m a weak reader and so as i’ve begun reading the koran 7 verses at a time, it hepls me to cut and paste them after i’ve read them because i then re-read them on this post. they may have absolutely nothing to do with this article. i welcome any input as to historical context or to whom some of the pronouns are refering.

    ya’ll what me to start over, or use a different website, i see defendtheprophet has become faithinallah, and has an online koran.


    you may not have been around then. but i’ve commented on geller several times before, i think she is a moron. as for stockpiling weapons, i don’t have any idea what the norwegian laws are. here in america you are free to stockpile weapons. as a matter of fact a local radio personallity here in tampa, “bubba the love sponge” (real name todd clem) was talking with tucker carlson last week. they both appearently have a lot of guns. they where talking about the debt ceiling and some one …long story short bubba said he had 250,000 rounds of ammo. as for the last line in this article: “Can anyone imagine the reaction had Norwegians (or Muslims!) mocked the victims of 9/11 in this way?” don’t think he is muslim or norwegian but wasn’t there a profrossor in colorado you called the victums of 9/11 litte eichmanns. free speech allows morons from all walks of life to show their stupidity.

  12. richard,

    “to mike i think it will be better enough to stay on topic misquoting and picking of holy quran verses fro hate sites wont do you good……..its funny how you may think you know but you know nothing….”

    what have i misquoted????? i’m assuming you mean “from hate sites”? again is the university of michigan a hate site? as for what i think i know, i always start with the assumpstion that i know nothing.

    Socrates said something like: “The only thing I know is that I don’t know anything.”

  13. I just can’t fathom how the Media in general chooses to pen this lunatic Breivik as a ‘Right-Winger’, or a ‘Gunman’ or a ‘Nationalist’. Where as ten years ago, when a few lunatics decided to bomb a building and use Islam as an excuse, they were called ‘Terrorists’.

    The Media calls us Muslims as Terrorists at the slightest hint of a Muslim doing something immoral. Here is a white man bombing the hell out of his own country and he is called a Right-winger ?

    Its absurd how the Media treats us. I have read Biblical and Torah laws.
    Our Quran, the Bible and the Torah are STRIKINGLY simillar. Infact Shariah law preaches most of the laws of the old testement. So why is it that a Muslim terrorist is called an ‘Islamic Fundamentalist’? Are they trying to suggest Islam preaches violent fundamentals? Why does not one visit the Old testement to see the wrath of God in full swing?

    Also I would highlight the fact that before the penning of the Shahriah in our Prophet’s time, women were oppressed even more. Women were buried alive when their husbands died.

    The main reason why so many people accepted Islam is because the Shariah law was more practical than other laws in that time.

    They call us Barbarians,
    whereas our Quran praises Jesus and Mother Mary way more than the whole of the new testement combined.

    Quran mentions ‘Jesus’ more than ‘Muhammed’.

    Infact, the only point worth arguing over is Muslims believing that Jesus was not crucified. We simply believe that God would never allow a horrible death like crucifixion befall his prophets. Moreover Crucifixion was a way of cursing people back then. The Jews wanted to crucify him so that he would be cursed under God’s law in the old testament. We simply believe that God’s own prophet cannot be cursed under God’s own law

  14. nafee khan,

    “Why does not one visit the Old testement to see the wrath of God in full swing?”

    i agree totally. the god of abraham is brutal. i’ve read the old testement. from fire and brimstone to floods. that’s why all the abrahamic religions are scary. that’s why all fundamentalist (those who see their religious law “god’s law” as something to be imposed on society) are scary.

    “Are they trying to suggest Islam preaches violent fundamentals?” yes, well i’m saying yes, the fundamentals of Hudud are violent.

    Punishments by way of Hadd are of the following forms: death by stoning, amputation of a limb or limbs, flogging by one hundred or eighty strokes. They are prescribed respectively for the following offences: adultery committed by married persons, theft, highway robbery, drunkenness and slander imputing unchastity to women.

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>