Joe Lieberman Says U.S. Should Cut Social Security To Pay For Fighting ‘The Islamist Extremists’
By Zaid Jilani on Aug 2, 2011 at 1:16 pm
This past April, right-wing war hawk John Bolton suggested during an interview on Fox News that the United States should cut Social Security and Medicare to finance the defense budget.
During debate over the debt deal today on the Senate floor, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) appeared to endorse this call. Lieberman explained that he is working with Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) on a Social Security spending reduction plan and that “we can’t protect these entitlements and also have the national defense…to protect us…with Islamist extremists”:
LIEBERMAN: I want to indicate today to my colleagues that Senator Coburn and I are working again on a bipartisan proposal to secure Social Security over the long term, we hope to have that done in time. To also forward to the special committee for their consideration. So, bottom line, we can’t protect these entitlements and also have the national defense we need to protect us in a dangerous world while we’re at war with Islamist extremists who attacked us on 9/11 and will be for a long time to come.
Watch it:
As ThinkProgress’s Ben Armbruster notes, the Bolton-Lieberman plan is “is basically a reverse Robin Hood scheme: robbing the poor to pay the rich, or really, the Military Industrial Complex on steroids.” As Ambruster points out, a “recent Reuters poll found that Americans would rather cut defense spending than raid social services in order to solve the debt and deficit problems.” Americans do not appear to have the priorities of these two war hawks.
Original post: Joe Lieberman Says U.S. Should Cut Social Security To Pay For Fighting ‘The Islamist Extremists’







I am not a Tea Partier, but agree with them that government should be downsized to provide protection for the American people, which includes fighting Islamic terrorism on our terms and in the place of our choosing, and protecting our southern border against unwanted immigrants. It should also provide the infrastructure to allow commerce, and then should get out of the way.
The Constitution does not require the federal government to assist in the financing of higher education, provide heating assistance, or help people pay mortgages that they should not have been given.
America has become a land of “gimme” and it is time for people to realize that you have to give before you can get. A national sales tax will increase the number of givers. Then, these people who now pay nothing and demand everything will have a legitimate say in what the government does.
3 August 2011 at 12:50 am