Monday, June 14, 2021   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home »

Umm, Iran, Can You, Like, Give Back Our Drone Please? [Updated]

15 December 2011 7 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

Umm, Iran, Can You, Like, Give Back Our Drone Please? [Updated]

Recently, I’ve been focusing on the double standards in the U.S. media and national discourse with regard to American foreign policy in the Middle East and greater Muslim world.  This leads to absurdities like this:

President Barack Obama said today the U.S. has requested that Iran return the highly sensitive stealth drone that crash landed there two weeks ago, but an Iranian general already said that’s not going to happen.

“We’ve asked for it back. We’ll see how the Iranians respond,” Obama said at a news conference.

So, let me get this straight: the U.S. has been using surveillance from stealth drones to bomb and assassinate targets inside Iran, one of these drones goes down while flying inside Iran’s sovereign territory, and now the U.S. is asking for it back?  This reminds me of childhood story an Indian friend of mine told me: his mother used to ask for her shoe back whenever she used to throw it at him.

A shocked Iranian military official replied:

No one returns the symbol of aggression to the party that sought secret and vital intelligence related to the national security of a country.

What do you think the United States would do if an Iranian drone was downed in U.S. territory?  We all know the answer: bomb Iran back to the Stone Ages.  Or, at minimum we would use drones to drop a few bombs on their heads.

Some Americans wonder why there are so many Muslim suicide bombers.  Well, they don’t have drones, which are the American equivalent of suicide bombers.  Drones have the added benefit that they can be operated without fear of any personal harm.

Drones are now America’s favorite Muslim killer, used against at least six different Muslim countries (Iran could be considered the seventh Muslim country to have this honor).

But, always remember: they (Iranians, Muslims, etc.) are so violent, and we are so peaceful.


JihadWatch’s Marisol just posted an article complaining about the fact that “Pakistan will shoot down any U.S. drone that intrudes its air space.” (h/t Believing Atheist) Marisol huffs: “So, does anyone still say ‘friend and ally?'”

The “threat” comes after U.S. drones violated Pakistan’s sovereignty for the millionth time and committed what under international law is considered an act of war: they bombed and killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.  Some “friend and ally” America is.

This is not the first time American drones have killed Pakistanis.  In fact, they have been doing so for many years, killing hundreds of civilians–including children.

If Mexico routinely sent killer drones across the border to snuff out American lives, what do you think the American reaction would be?

But in the Orwellian world of JihadWatch, it is the party that defends its sovereignty that is at fault (because it is Muslim) whereas the party violating sovereignty is justified in doing so (since it is fighting Muslims).  Unfortunately, this bizarro world is not limited to the loony land of JihadWatch but rather exists in mainstream political discourse and is a part of conventional wisdom.


  1. The only thing more despicable than Obama, and his murderous and hypocritical rhetoric, is the fact that not a single reporter has pointed these facts out to him, and asked him the intuitive question about what we would do, if the drones were killing Americans. We have officially hit bottom on other levels, because “most” are no longer capable of sorting out the wicked lies and actions of a military and political regime hell bent on destroying the world.

  2. You’re forgeting the most important point; Pakistanis aren’t real people, silly!

    At least that’s what the majority of Americans seem to think anymore.

  3. Any country that has been threatening and secretive will arouse the curiosity of other countries to the point where they spy on it.

    It’s like the cold war, everyone silent and spying and assasinating.

  4. Could say any group of people threatening and secretive will also be spied on.

  5. Let’s not forget that Iran is run by a nearly totalitarian government that would slaughter every individual in the state of Israel – the ally of the U.S. – if it could. Surveillance of Iran is quite justified. Though any request for the drone’s return would be pointless, its presence in Iranian airspace is not so great an offense considering Iranian intentions towards American allies. As for drone strikes that kill civilians, I find that these are obviously accidental,and by no means malicious. To say otherwise and somehow imply that the Obama administration intends to take over the world or attack middle-eastern nations without due cause is sheer idiocy. The United States (Under a Democratic president) would be very averse to threatening any nation unless it was deserving of that threat. Now, by no means is this a dismissal of the plight of the citizenry of the countries that the United States bombs, far from it, but it is a reminder of the fact that America’s fight is not with the populous of these states, but with its militants and, in some cases, with its corrupt regimes.

  6. Good points made. Major error though. As I understand it, the attack in Pakistan formally wasn’t the US but a NATO operation (with a US plane) with full knowledge and permission from the Pakistani government. Thus, sovereign airspace wasn’t violated in Pakistan and no international laws were violated. It was a case of friendly fire, which has turned less friendly now.

  7. Give it back to America please…..after decoding of course.LOL

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>