36 Comments »

The NYT has run news stories that could have gotten people killed. They ran an anti catholic ad with no problem. Part of the liberal bias against the RCC and Christianity in general plus the usual cowardice and pandering to Islam.

They should not have run the anti RCC ad. They would not have run an anti Judaism ad either.

Once in a while they gingerly touch on the murder and mayhem going on and spring off it.

//anon
19 March 2012 at 11:52 am

good for you New York Times… now if you do it when it’s not a threat to our troops just because hate messages have no place in your newspaper that would be beyond awesome…

//Pat Jenquin Rahikainen via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 1:46 pm

Good call by the NYT. I hope this opens the door to stopping all of the anti-religious things we see in this country. Religion is a highly personal matter, and should be left as such, no matter the faith.

//Anthony Nuccio via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 1:49 pm

Pamela Gellar is a no talent hack that thinks someone cares what she has to say.Egomanic Maxximus!

//Michael Asbury via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 1:49 pm

It’s a pity they didn’t turn it down because its offensive, rather than use the ‘it endangers our troops’ argument.

//Mike Evans Gypsyscholar via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 1:51 pm

How come freedom of religion when they are actually fighting a religion?? Asking people to stop believing in what they want to believe in isn’t freedom of religion. Freedom of religion is letting people believe and practice the religion they want to.. If they wanna be Muslims or Christians or anything else. This anti Islam non-sense only says that you guys don’t believe in anything called FREEDOM, you just believe that what you say is right and everyone should follow that. Where is the freedom in that???
I have no idea what freedom are you trying to spread, your idea of freedom or the idea of being free!!

//Gigi Al Attar
19 March 2012 at 1:53 pm

You would think that they would have a moral standard to apply, such as, paid for hate speech is still hate speech. We need to acknowledge in this country that having a lot of money does not allow you to cry ‘FIRE’ in a crowded theater

//Steven McCornack via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 1:54 pm

I wonder what will please people like Pamela and Spencer. Surely they want something in particular from muslims. Maybe we should get on TV and tell the world how bad Islam is. Getting on TV to explain the beauty of Islam is off limits and no one is interested in that. “Never will the Jews or Christians be pleased with you until you follow their religion” – 2:120

//Julius Allen via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 2:00 pm

Calling the organization “SION”? Yeah, that’s not gonna get anyone’s back up.

//Corey
19 March 2012 at 2:04 pm

Right move, wrong reason. It was not fir to print.

//Martin Mould via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 2:10 pm

Freedom of speech should be used with common sense. People who hate Islam are people who hate god because Islam thanks god for all blessings every day five times a day. These people are people who worship the dollar and hate anything that have to do with a higher power being given credit to our existence.

//Ahmed Mohamed via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 2:22 pm

I like the term “quitting” Islam. Reminds me of the scene in Brokeback Mountain where one cowboy tells the other, “I just can’t quit you.”

//Emery El Habiby via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 2:27 pm

Pamela and spencer are both a joke..! There are whole lots of issues in front of them to deal with rather than fighting against Islam. They can never do away with Islam on this earth so is Christianity..! They will surely end up in the tomb whiles Islam continues to grow and exist..! You cant indict Islam with the actions of some unscrupulous muslims or individuals who are not even muslims. Islam is unique..! Pamela and spencer 50 chinese recently converted to Islam in one day. ALLAHU AKBAR..!

//Abdul Karim via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 2:54 pm

Geller is a loon, but she did this ad in reaction to the anti Catholic ad the NYT ran. NYT would not run an ad saying it’s ime to quit being a Jew or any other religion.

People angry at the church’s opposition to contraception and abortion proposed the ad, NYT placed it.

The US has been accepting many catholic immigrants for years. Might turn into an RC country. Maybe a theocratic RC country. Run for your lives.

//anon
19 March 2012 at 2:57 pm

Quit being Stupid!!!!!. I love my faith and religion

//Val Walker via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 3:29 pm

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is collecting funds to run an ad urging Catholics to quit the Catholic Church. That wouldn’t put our troops in danger.

//Chloe Lietzke via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 3:35 pm

I thought Spencer and Geller wouldn’t want anything to do with the liberal NYT. —Personally, I find the NYT to be too much geared towards liberalism for my taste, but I don’t actively go out of my way to bash the Times for “pandering” to a religious minority, and later expect to have my ad placed on the papers.

//Harrison H Elfrink via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 3:39 pm

Correction: the “Quit the Catholic Church” ad ran March 9. Full page.

//Chloe Lietzke via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 3:47 pm

I lol’d at the the ‘genocide’ that Islam supposedly caused.

Hitler wasn’t Muslim.
Rwanda, the killing wasn’t because of Muslims. Instead, Muslims sheltered victims on both sides.
Israel killing off Palestinians arent Muslims.
Serbains killing off Yugoslavians and Bosnians weren’t Muslims.
The mongols who turned Baghdad into carnage weren’t Muslims. not until after they gave up their genocidal ways anyways.
The Crusaders werent muslims.

The only notable time Muslims or any Muslim leadership was involved in any type of genocide was when the Ottoman Empire was killing the Armenians, and those were in the dying days of the Muslim Empire, and most Muslims agree that it died off because it not longer followed anything Islamic by then, but it simply became more a more turkish, cultural cause.

I wonder how much NYT rejected the ad campaign on basis of not wanting to cause friction between ‘minorities’ as opposed to simply not wanting be part of publishing something so blatantly stupid.

Spencer and Geller are idiots, and only idiots follow them.

//Taysseer Kadri via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 3:59 pm

The Freedom From Religion Foundation ran a full-page ad in the NYT saying “Quit the Catholic Church, March 9. Of course, this would not endanger the troops c

//Chloe Lietzke
19 March 2012 at 4:01 pm

This was a good call, but it is unfortunate that the NYT didn’t also reject the anti-catholic ad.

//Art Brooks via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 4:12 pm

The muslims may not have done a grand genocide like the Nazis only because so far they have been unable to.

They have screamed for years for large scale death, and their wars, eg Iran-Iraq, have killed quite a few.

Historically their invasions killed a great many, eg India, some Hindus still mad about that, and they ethnic cleanse populations, the massacres may be smaller than genocide, but they have the effect of ridding the country of minorities.

//anon
19 March 2012 at 4:28 pm

LOL Tayseer…they tried to frame those on Muslims?
It’s funny that the latter four; the Israeli attacks on Palestinians, the Serbian massacre of Bosnians and Ethnic Albanians, the Mongol’s pillage of Baghdad and the Crusades were acts committed by non-Muslims against Muslims.
As for the Armenian Genocide; the truth behind it is always being manipulated by Turkish nationalists and Armenian patriots alike. Some Armenians conspired with the Russians against the Ottoman Empire, and the Turks who carried out the massacres were not Muslims, but Kemalists and Young Turks who advocated staunch secularism and modern nationalism. During the Islamic Ottoman period, the Armenians were seen as one of greatest millets of the Empire up until the 19th century.

//Harrison H Elfrink via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 4:44 pm

When a German Muslim scholar was asked about
terrorism and Islam, He said: Who started the first
world war? Muslims? Who started the second world
war? Muslims? Who killed about 20 millions of
Aborigines in Australia? Muslims?? Who sent the
nuclear bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Muslims?? Who killed more than 100 millions of
Indians in North America ? Musl…ims?? Who killed
more than 50 millions of Indians in south America?
Muslims?? Who took about 180 millions of African
people as slaves and 88% of them died and was
thrown in Atlantic ocean? Muslims?? No, They weren’t Muslims!!! First of all, You have to define terrorism
properly… If a non-Muslim do something bad..it is
crime. But if a Muslim commit same..he is terrorist…So
first remove this double standard…then come to the
point..! They are completely bastards and dumb persons..!

//Abdul Karim via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 4:46 pm

Both are numties and are actually so dim that it’s not worth commenting on their idiotic rants!

//Ghizala Saddique via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 5:30 pm

Amerikan troops in the (Afghan) region SHOULD be in danger- -it’s called war, dullards!

//Lenny North via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 5:47 pm

I suppose you would say that the muslims who invaded India and Iberia, and who are now murdering Christians, Kurds, etc. are not muslims because muslims would never do such things, huh.

//anon
19 March 2012 at 6:25 pm

good for them!

//Lee Sides via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 9:10 pm

Anon
Thats exactly what were saying. Do you get it now?

//Elle
19 March 2012 at 9:26 pm

I guess the mooselimbs that highjacked the jets and murdered 3000 innocents on 9/11 weren’t terrorists. Thats a new one. Israelis kill the murderers that shoot rockets at innocent people. Where do you all get your logic from, a pedophile?

//Chris Gennett via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 10:00 pm

Muslims are sidestepping their problems. It doesn’t matter who is what. They should address the problems going on.

A Christian could say the same thing about violent people in their societies.

//anon
19 March 2012 at 10:48 pm

“dedicated to freedom of religion” but urges Muslims to quit theirs!
“dedicated to freedom of conscience” but defiles sacred icons of others!
“dedicated to individual rights” but goes around calling for depriving Muslims of their rights.
Is she demented, schizophrenic, or hypocritical?

//Ayman Freeman via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 10:52 pm

Who let the trolls out???

//Julius Allen via Facebook
19 March 2012 at 11:03 pm

The reason there is islamophobia and muslimophobia is because most countries in which muslims are the majority are intolerant hellholes.

Unable to understand that their problems spring from themselves, they are antagonistic to the rest of the world. We are the best people in the world! Been said by others with disastrous results.

//anon
20 March 2012 at 6:01 am

Hey Chris, learn how to spell simple words such as “independent,” or “supplement.” No one takes a moron seriously.

//Umar Syed via Facebook
20 March 2012 at 6:40 am

How about calling things the way it really is…The only thing putting troups in danger is themselves and how they act….think about it

//Cindy Adams via Facebook
20 March 2012 at 10:25 am

Have your say!

Recent Posts

• ‘Hate Crime': Taxi Cab Driver Survives Brutal Attack
• British Muslims Face Worst Job Discrimination of Any Minority Group
• Brigitte Gabriel: ‘No Chance’ Of Muslim Americans ‘Blending In’ To U.S.
• ISIS says Islam justifies slavery – what does Islamic law say?
• Shots fired at mosque in Southern California

Most Popular

Tags