Monday, April 21, 2014   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » General

Islamophobia and the Fear of ‘The Other’ in Myanmar

11 June 2012 General 26 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

by Francis Wade

Chiang Mai, Thailand – The mob that set upon and killed a group of Muslims riding a bus through western Myanmar on June 3 displayed a depravity normally the hallmark of the country’s military. News reports that emerged in the wake of the incident, allegedly in response to the gang rape and murder of a Buddhist girl by three Muslim men days before, described the ten victims of a frenzied beating being urinated upon before the bus was set ablaze.

Comments that circulated the internet in the wake of the massacre were almost as shocking. “Killing Kalars is good!” one person said, using the pejorative slur that has become a popular and casual way of referring to Muslims of South Asian decent (one that state media also regularly employs). It mattered little that the men accused of the rape had already been arrested.

The attack was a rare incident; the reactions suggest however that heightened levels of resentment towards the presence of Muslims in Myanmar society exist on a much wider scale. This animosity is shared by senior figures in the government – current representative to the UN, Ye Myint Aung, once described the Rohingya, a Muslim minority in Arakan state who are singled out for particularly savage treatment, as “ugly as ogres”, while since 1982 the government has denied them citizenship, claiming they are “illegal Bengali immigrants”. Persecution of the group has been so protracted and debased that Medicins San Frontieres describes them as being among the world minority groups “most in danger of extinction”.

While Myanmar’s myriad ethnic groups have all suffered egregious treatment at the hands of the military government, which has sought to bring the country “under one flag”, the fear of Muslims is a particular one. On the website of The Voice journal, which issued an apology after being bombarded with threats following its coverage of the massacre, one visitor wrote: “We should either kill all the Kalars in Burma or banish them otherwise Buddhism will cease to exist”.

The ‘other’

Treatment of Muslims as the ‘other’ persists despite the country’s push to embrace the outside world and everything it offers. There is something of a contradiction then in the population’s desire to become global players, which will see it interacting far more with non-Myanmar, non-Buddhist ethnicities. In Arakan state, where tension between Buddhists and Muslims often spills over into violence, hypocrisy is also evident in attempts by Arakanese to goad public opinion against the Rohingya in the name of “nationalism”. These are the same Arakanese who, ironically, regularly accuse the government of attempting to aggressively assimilate Arakanese into the Burman way of life.

Such is the treatment of Rohingya that up to 300,000 now reside in Bangladesh, which in turn sees them as illegal immigrants from Myanmar and denies them citizenship. They are the epitome of stateless, and spend their lives in unofficial camps where conditions are notoriously poor (only 28,000 are registered by the UN). Their disaffection has made them ripe for Islamic militant groups and human traffickers. Many attempt the perilous sea journey from Bangladesh to Malaysia and beyond to find work – in December last year, a boatload of more than 60 who ran into trouble off the coast of southern Myanmar were detained by Myanmar police, ironically on immigration charges.

Read the rest…

Original post: Islamophobia and the Fear of ‘The Other’ in Myanmar

Share/Bookmark




26 Comments »

  1. Muslims had better stay calm and not indulge in any massacre tit for tat depravity of their own, for which they are famous.

    They had also best shut up about their plans to eliminate/dominate everybody, as Omar Hammami who apparently isn’t dead after all – second time he’s started rumor of his death – describes in his latest delusional writings and speeches.

  2. So why isn’t this article mentioning the muslim retaliation – hundreds of burnt down homes and shops, 7 people dead, etc.?

    What if the rest of us behaved like muslims? What if after 9/11 NY mobs had rushed through the streets, yelling praises to God while murdering anyone who looked like a muslim?

    What if every time a muslim said or did something we didn’t like, we went on a rampage?

  3. Maybe we did riot. You could call jumping into 2 countries and messing up a third a grand Gujarat sort of riot, not an entirely sane reaction. No sense in damaging NY any further.

  4. People in the US do not realize that Islamic peoples exist an live in what was once called INDO-CHINA etc.

  5. This was a HORRIBLE incident.

  6. This is why so many Thailand Muslims never left Saudia.

  7. Halford Jones,

    where do you get that from?

  8. anon,

    So you say that the carnage on Muslims is justified? Fine, I ask you: if the Muslims had been killing Buddhists in Myanmar, what would your reactions be? when the shithead Talibans destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas, the whole west bursted into protest, yet showed no concern to the massacre the Talibans had been waging against their own countrypeople. In fact, Taliban and Osama (dust)bin Laden are US and West’s Love-children. But when the 9/11 took place, that set you on fire. I ask you again: if Salman Rushdie has committed a crime against Islam and Muslims, or Raw-fart Stencher, Daniel Piles, Scumella Failure, Jyllands Posten, K. Westergaard, Lars Vilks—who are all everytime spewing filth against Islam and Muslims, through their swinish tongues and worm infested hands, and are living protected (I guess they have more protection than Jesus [PBUH]) in your territories, were demanded by Muslims to be brought to justice by Muslims, and if your governments did not comply and Muslims tried to attack and destroy your countries, how would you react? When the Danish cartoons and Swedish pictures condemning my Prophet came out, the US and the West supported Denmark in the name of freedom of speech. Would you have supported the barbarism your forefathers did to the New World inhabitants if those were drawn as the US standing on the skeletons and blood of Native Americans, also at the cost of Mexico? the Holocaust (a Christian Crime), the Russian persecution of Jews in cartoons being criticised in the name of freedom of speech? How would you react the Iberian Conquest by Moors or the Byzantine empire being ravaged by the bloodthirstry Turks in the form of heavily derogatory yet sensual cartoons?

    Hyposrisy and telling lies for demonising others have their limits. You seem to have crossed that a long time ago. Remember, you can’t pelt a stone at other’s glass-house while living in a same house yourself.

  9. No, I would like an end to all carnage everywhere.

    Violent hysterical reactions annoy me, yes. Lynch mobs disgust me, they killed some of Rushdie’s publication workers, the murder of aids workers because a crazy pastor in Florida burned a Koran. Yes, all of that crazy stuff annoys me, the fact that it is egged on in the mosques is also disgusting.

    I am just as annoyed when the crazy stuff kills muslims. An illiterate woman was lynched one year for using bits of newspaper which bore Koran quotations as wrapping material. How pitiful.

    Yesterday NYT had an article on the dean of a University in Tunisia trying to cope with the violent idiot Salafi students.

    Strange that the various countries can’t/won’t grant citizenship to the Rohinghas.

  10. Here’s some background on Muslims in Myanmar:
    http://uscampaignforburma.org/rohingya-people-of-burma/
    Their problems have been going on for decades.

  11. You can start that by enlightening about the terrible plight of non-muslims (including ethnic burmese, hindus and other buddhists) in muslim dominated Bangladesh or even within Burma itself. Not to mention the chapter in history, were muslim kings conducted mass genocides of ethnic burmese and destroyed most of their western temples.

    The atrocities committed against the rohingya is peanuts compared to what your kind have done to buddhists, hindus and christians in Bangladesh. This is regardless of the fact that muslims were responsible for starting the violence in the first place (the rape of the girl for this incident). The burmese, like the thai, have just retaliated in defense. Don’t cry when you lose wars that you started.

    There is a legit reason when people expel and do not accept violent sycophants in their home. No, Canada is not an option, they can try jumping into the bengal sea or getting getting eaten by the giant bengal tiger if they cannot change their violent, intolerant ways to adjust and live peacefully among the buddhists.

  12. Rudolphn-where is you got information and approve?

  13. dongo,

    come on dude. you’re letting this anger get the best of ya. “when the shithead Talibans destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas, the whole west bursted into protest,” don’t remember anyone dying in those protests. your exageration aside, doubt pat robertson cared. did you not see the article on this site where he advised a caller to destroy her roommates buddha? yes it was a big story. they were 5000 years old. irreplaceable. and i think on the UN list of world historical/cultural sites. whatever it’s called. but to say “yet showed no concern to the massacre the Talibans had been waging against their own countrypeople” is utter non-sense. there was contant concern by human rights watch, amnesty international, countless stories of taliban atrocities. 60 mins ran a piece on the public executions in the soccer statium. i remeber the taliban spokesman saying. if it upsets the international community, you should build us another soccer stadium, that we can use for soccer. but we will keep publicly executing people. you know why. “and let a group of believes witness their chastisment”. i remeber jay leno’s wife coming out in a burqa on the tonight show to try and rally people to the defence of afghan women. put of course she was out of line to critisize someone elses culture. so you wanted us to invade afghanistan and take the taliban out. mission accomplish. just a little late. ” In fact, Taliban and Osama (dust)bin Laden are US and West’s Love-children.” how so. we certainly backed the mujahideen against the soviets. that meant that the tribes of afghanistan had to infight after the soviet withdraw? didn’t the northern alliance have 90% of the country under control. then the taliban rose up out of a pashtun alliance. it’s always the west’s fault. why isn’t the afghan’s fault.

    “But when the 9/11 took place, that set you on fire.” no shit. so we should have done nothing?

    dongo, dongo, dongo…… you clearly have no idea about freedom of speech in the west. maybe you should come visit. “were demanded by Muslims to be brought to justice by Muslims,” so what would your “justice” be? i thought sharia only applied to muslims?????????? so why are non-muslims “criminals” for blasphamy???????? your religion is so confusing. i’m starting to think no muslim even knows what it is supposed to be?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ

  14. here a more recent ruling. we hold our freedom of speech above your “right not to be offended” or even the “intentional infliction of emotional distress”.

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-751.pdf

    i said: “you clearly have no idea about freedom of speech in the west” scratch that, i should have said in the US. the german’s outlaw the swastika. and holucoust denial. maybe all of europe have those crazy laws. europe and canada and maybe australia, not sure, have laws against “hate speech”.

  15. “Ultraconservative Islamists known as Salafis attacked an art gallery Sunday in a Tunis”

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jSofjZy4oA6Hdhy1pVUTmsyYAO0Q?docId=39b31bafb0c644b38c3ac4afb1690d3e

  16. R. Schumpeter,

    Bangladesh was never a hindu land before 600 AD. It was a Buddhist one. The Mauryas tried to exert their power but had little success. A non-Hindu King from the Nanda dynasty took arms against the Hindu rule and he decimated them, extending his own rule to Afghanistan even. His name is Mahapadma Nanda. Later, a Buddhist king Harshavardhana, whose brother Rajyavardhana was deceitfully murdered by Hindu king Shashanka, promised that he woudn’t eat with his right hand until he erases hindus from India. He did that. Then came the Buddhist Pala dynasty who despite many successes against hindu barbarism, succumbed to Hindu deception.

    And what bullshit are you talking about non-Muslim persecution in Bangladesh? The Christian British looted us for 190 years. Remember, until Britain defeated Bengal (here through cheating as well), they could not establish their rule over whole India. In their attempt to baptise the whole Bangladesh, they introduced missionaries. These swine used to go to villagepeople and start to demonise Islam. Yet there were two bards who busted them like whores. They were Munshi Meherullah and Munshi Zamiruddin. Even then, there are Christians in Bangladesh. Their number is exploding like atomic bombs. In the tribal and poor areas where missionaries go and baptise people, their first and foremost duty is to spew filth of Muslims and Islam. These are done in the guise of assistance. In a mid-southwest district, where a church was allegedly burned to ground by Muslims was ulitmately revealed to be burnt by a committee member of Hindu background (baptised) who had earlier enmity with Muslims. In my earlier posts, I told what the Hindus did to Muslims and low-caste Hindus during the British rule. Yet, you still blame us. In which Muslim country will you find non-Muslim ministers, civil servants, and non-Muslim holidays in status of public holidays? We have those provisions. Does the US/West declare Muslim holidays as public holidays? Possibly not.

    And you are very concerned about Muslims destroying Burma. You used the name of a scholar, but seem to be more dunghead than me. Listen craphead, Muslims were in Burma much earlier than the fucking Christophucker Columbastard reached the Americas. In the Rakhaine province, there were Muslim ministers and courtiers. I can name one whose name was Magon Thhakur. During the democratic rule, the Rohingyas were Myanmar citizens acknowledged by the government. The Military rulers revoked their ethnicity and citizenship.

    And I think you got the crime news committed by Rohingyas from “Islam watch”. Sites and people like these did not come to the world from their mother’s womb but from their father’s anus, understansd? You can now accuse me of my “Islamic anger”.

  17. R S,

    Possibly you forgot that tigers do not live in seas or oceans but in forests or mountains. And regarding your genocidally racist comment, I would like to propose you: How about kicking out all non-native American from the Americas and Oceania and destroy all the new religions there including Christianity, Judaism and Islam from these places?

  18. Mike,

    Yes Sir, Yes Sir three bags full. I know none died in those protests. But when PR made those comments, I think no major world media covered that thing. If any Muslim had made such a comment, I bet there would be a great hue and cry on Muslims and Islam.

    Where did I exaggerate things? You call me an utter nonsese. You in fact are a greater nonsense. I never deny there were concerns. But where were these concerns amassing into any overt steps to halt the bloodbath waged by Taliban? Your fucking “Humanitarian (!?*) Intervention”? Unless there is no interest to be served, you never show “Humanity”. And that Humanity (!?*) is selctive as well as with vested interests. The Humanitarian Intervention is also 100% questionable. Why should you stick your nose into others’ affairs? Will the US ever allow others to intervene in its business?

    See, you drank your own blood. The US and the West used the Mujahideen to educate the USSR. Where do you find the NA controlled the 90% of Afghanistan? If so, how could the Taliban unleash their reign of terror on the country? Listen, the concept of “White Man’s Burden” is thoroughly wrong and should be “White Man is Burden” instead.

    I have some idea about freedom of speech in the West. It is tantamount to “might is right”. When the Danish cartoons came out, the black slut Condoleezza Rice said “We support Denmark. Freedom of Speech must be upheld.” If that is freedom of speech, why not speaking and protesting against that be considered as freedom of speech? When you speak something pejorative/offensive to Muslims, that is your freedom of speech. But when you are bitten back, then that biter is intolerant, fundamentalist, jihadist, Islamist, anti-modern, Nazi, Islamo-fascist and so on. If a Muslim cleric says something anti-West, anti-Christian and Judaism or say for instance supporting Islam, and some Muslims support him, how do you react?

    My religion may be confusing to me and demonic to others including you. But I am comfortable with my religion though I am not religious at all. Don’t blame Islamic Shariah alone. There are provisions for punishments against blasphemers in the OT. “He who blasphemes the name of Yahweh, he shall surely be put to death; all the congregation shall certainly stone him: the foreigner as well as the native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death. (Leviticus Ch 24, Vr16)”; “I tell you, everyone who confesses me before men, him will the Son of Man also confess before the angels of God; 9 but he who denies me in the presence of men will be denied in the presence of the angels of God. 10 Everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but those who blaspheme against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. (Luke Ch12, Vr 8-10)

    I am totally correct about the 9/11 comment. Every nation has right to self-defence but that does not mean you will ravage another nation. You did not answer my question: Salman Rushdie, Raw-fart Stencher, Daniel Piles, Scumella Failure, Jyllands Posten, K. Westergaard, Lars Vilks—who are all everytime committing crimes against Islam and Muslims spewing filth against Islam and Muslims, through their swinish tongues and worm infested hands, and are living protected (I guess they have more protection than Jesus [PBUH]) in your territories, were demanded by Muslims to be brought to justice by Muslims, and if your governments did not comply and Muslims tried to attack and destroy your countries, how would you react?

  19. RS,

    I guess, in reference to your “tiger” proposal, there are enough tiger sharks in US waters. You better jump in tiger shark infested waters, make a video of it and post that thing to internet. We will copy that and send it to our government so that they can use it to teach Rohingyas. Our country’s waters lack tiger sharks.

  20. RS,

    It is true that my kind has committed many ghoulish crimes; but those bastards will always fall short of what your kind and your loved ones i.e. Hindus and Buddhas have done to the world. Utter another word, and I will see you again.

  21. dongo,

    “But when PR made those comments, I think no major world media covered that thing” i don’t know who PR is?

    “Where did I exaggerate things?” when you said “the whole west bursted into protest”. and that there where no concerns.

    “You in fact are a greater nonsense. I never deny there were concerns.” clearly you say “no concern”. come on dude it’s right above in black and white.

    “But where were these concerns amassing into any overt steps to halt the bloodbath waged by Taliban?” no where, nor did i ever claim there to be overt steps. so you wanted the US to invade?

    “Your fucking “Humanitarian (!?*) Intervention”? Unless there is no interest to be served, you never show “Humanity”. And that Humanity (!?*) is selctive as well as with vested interests. The Humanitarian Intervention is also 100% questionable.” that seems a bit of an exaggeratation as well. ever hear of usaid? we gave the egyptian like 300 million to fix the sewers in cario. how much money have we given hatti. come on, we give billions away with no vested interst every year.
    “Why should you stick your nose into others’ affairs?” i’m all for eliminating all foriegn aid.
    “Will the US ever allow others to intervene in its business?” i hope not. well we let the french help us out in the revolution. but that was pre-united states, kinda of. nor would i ever see a need for others help. actually after the deep horizon explosion there where calls for bringing in dutch oil skimmers. i was for that.

    “See, you drank your own blood. The US and the West used the Mujahideen to educate the USSR.” do you mean eradicate? you’re a little scary with your sayings.

    “Where do you find the NA controlled the 90% of Afghanistan?” i think i read it in newsweek. i did my high school senior thesis on the soviet invasion of afghanistan. let me google. i maybe wrong. anyways what’s the differance? why did the afghan infight after the withdrawl of the soviets?

    “If so, how could the Taliban unleash their reign of terror on the country?” i think the pashtuns stopped fighting each other formed an alliance, called the taliban and pushed back.

    “Listen, the concept of “White Man’s Burden” is thoroughly wrong and should be “White Man is Burden” instead.” lol.

    “I have some idea about freedom of speech in the West. It is tantamount to “might is right”.” how so? we allow dissident speech all the time. burning the US flag is protected speech. how is that might makes right?

    “When the Danish cartoons came out, the black slut Condoleezza Rice said “We support Denmark. Freedom of Speech must be upheld.” seriouly connie is a slut? anyways i agree totally. i guess i’m a slut?
    “If that is freedom of speech, why not speaking and protesting against that be considered as freedom of speech?” it is. you can speak and protest against that all you want. you can’t kill people. you sure you’re a lawyer?
    “When you speak something pejorative/offensive to Muslims, that is your freedom of speech.” finally we agree on something.
    “But when you are bitten back, then that biter is intolerant, fundamentalist, jihadist, Islamist, anti-modern, Nazi, Islamo-fascist and so on.” well if by “bite” you mean you kill me? then yes. but the iranians can run around chanting death to america all they want. here’s some guys in new york who protest all the time. they pull permits and have never been arrested nor have any riots erupted because of them. in case the link doesn’t come through google, the islamic thinkers society.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha0bwyipN4E

    “If a Muslim cleric says something anti-West, anti-Christian and Judaism or say for instance supporting Islam, and some Muslims support him, how do you react?” i’m all for copying and pasting his comments. i’ve never killed anyone. i welcome all crazy anti-western speech. best to know what crazies are thinking. dude you did read the supreme court rulings i posted? we protect offensive speech in america. please post an instance were we haven’t.

    “My religion may be confusing to me and demonic to others including you.” i don’t believe in demons, or jinn. but again, we agree, it is confusing.
    “But I am comfortable with my religion though I am not religious at all. Don’t blame Islamic Shariah alone.” i don’t blame “Shariah alone”, i think all the abrahamic religions to be equally backwards.

    “There are provisions for punishments against blasphemers in the OT. “He who blasphemes the name of Yahweh, he shall surely be put to death; all the congregation shall certainly stone him: the foreigner as well as the native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death. (Leviticus Ch 24, Vr16)”; “I tell you, everyone who confesses me before men, him will the Son of Man also confess before the angels of God; 9 but he who denies me in the presence of men will be denied in the presence of the angels of God. 10 Everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but those who blaspheme against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. (Luke Ch12, Vr 8-10)” dude i’m aware, i went to 12 years of catholic school. duetoronomy has some terrible laws as well. this is tantamount to bring up the crusades to me. i’m not a christian. i’m atheist.

    “I am totally correct about the 9/11 comment.” didn’t i agree with your 9/11 set the US on fire comment?
    “Every nation has right to self-defence but that does not mean you will ravage another nation.” well defence and ravage may not be mutually exclusive. ask the germans and japanesse. or the pagans of muhammad’s time.

    “You did not answer my question: Salman Rushdie, Raw-fart Stencher, Daniel Piles, Scumella Failure, Jyllands Posten, K. Westergaard, Lars Vilks—who are all everytime committing crimes against Islam and Muslims spewing filth against Islam and Muslims, through their swinish tongues and worm infested hands, and are living protected (I guess they have more protection than Jesus [PBUH]) in your territories, were demanded by Muslims to be brought to justice by Muslims, and if your governments did not comply and Muslims tried to attack and destroy your countries, how would you react” i asked what wuold your “justice” be. and i posted those links of supreme court rulings on freedom of speech. sorry i thought that made it clear that i think it is insane to kill someone over a book or drawings. not familar with all those people, but i know rushdie wrote satanic verses. are all the others authors or cartoonists? that’s not a crime against anyone.

    always fun speaking to ya.

  22. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Alliance

    not sure what i was thinking there. maybe i had my percentages backwrds. NA had 10% taliban 90%. it’s been 25 years. anyways i don’t get why the taliban are america’s love child?

  23. what kind of name is rudolph suckpeter?

  24. PR means Pat Robertson.

    That concern like earlier times had been selective too. Therefore, I called it “no concern.”

    No, I did not want the US to invade. But what I wanted to see was where the “Humanity” went. At least, there could be efforts to stop the Taliban playing football with innocent and helpless people. No, that did not happen. Instead, the US and allies tried to strengthen the Northern Alliance and anti-Taliban groups and people to fight the Taliban.

    I never exaggerated things. There were concerns but about the Bamiyan statues alone. Nevertheless I was impressed that some Muslim countries condemned Taliban and urged them to spare the statues. But there were no concerns for the population being wiped out by the Taliban. The overwhelmingly Sunni Taliban were massacring the Shiite Hazaras but none including Muslims showed any concern for them or contempt for Taliban waging ethnic cleansing.

    The US and the West will never allow others to interfere in other’s business but will always like to do the opposite and always does so.

    You may try your best but I think your government will not listen to your proposal. Because, if they do, they will lose a good and very effective tool to drink other’s blood and enslave them as long as they (US government) would like.

    I am not a native English speaker. But you are. The word “educate” also stands for teaching someone a lesson which the USSR received from US and allies quite well.

    In many countries, there have been infightings after the enemy withdrew. Afghanistan’s history has been littered with battles, bloodshed and infightings. Why are you seeing an anomaly? Furthermore, the Allied Powers fought the Axis Powers in WW-2. When that ended, the Cold War began between and among the allies. So?

    Rightly “White Man is Burden”. When the white man came to the black/brown, the white had nothing except deceit, greed and crusading fervour. Theses happened with Mughal India, the Americas, Oceania all. If I become rich, powerful, pious and philanthropic after looting other people and start to help them with their own properties I have looted and built my fortunes, I am 100% a bastard and a hellbound hellhound, how good may I be at present but none can deny that bloody facts. Here I may refer to Andrew Thomas’ “We are not the first” book. The author writes here that when Fuckeresco Franshitko Piss-arro butchered the Incas, there were just 90 tons of gold in whole Europe. Within 20 years after this incident, that amount reached 720 tons.

    I know the flag burning provision. But does that equate with/permit for unreasonably demonizing others? If that is your freedom of speech, I am sorry, I can’t support that. Surely my liking or disliking makes no issue. But we need to be sensitive about what others think. For example, anti-smokers always burn our (we who smoke like train engines) effigy when we are present. We say nothing and never try to stop them because we know that smoking really bothers other people especially women and children. Freedom (!?) of Speech proves very well when someone is trying to condemn or deny the holocaust, even criticize Israel in minimal.

    Of course, CR is a slut. If a person is waiting to be sent to the gallows and he is given a choice to be spared that he will have to stare at that bitch, he will surely chose to be executed rather than staring at that lousy bitch. I did not call you a slut.

    Yes I am a lawyer. No doubt on that. Biting back does not mean killing you, but just protesting the crap being spewed by you. My job is to save people, not kill them. Moreover, I never ask for my fees unless my client has come out victorious. I first study the entire case and if I find that the person is really guilty, I do not go to stand for that person. But when a person is found guilty apparently but is a victim of circumstance indeed, I fight for that fellow. This is why I earn quite less than my colleagues. Presently I drive a Toyota Prius. Had I gone for standing for every client without judging the person’s innocence or guilt, I would have been using a Toyota Crown (1,00,000 USD plus).

    Of course there has been no protest and anti-Islam and anti-Muslim acts are shielded under freedom of speech, art, research, study and other things to sugarcoat. The farts delivered by Stencher, Piles, Scumella, Oskar Fartsucker and ilk are never protested and every time become best sellers. Just take a look about Jihad Watch and you will find that all attempts to block this slimy swine’s site have ended in failure.

    You can’t equate the pagans’ condition of Prophet Muhammad’s time with US’s ravaging of other nations. The pagans unleashed hell on Muslims in earlier days, but they were spared when Muslims conquered Mecca. The reason they were punished was they would often break treaties, ally and conspire with enemies of Muslims. The case is not so with the US.

    My justice regarding that offence is pretty different from that prescribed by Islam. As I have said that I am not pious at all, my justice would be different. I would first bring those bastards to a debate forum and ask theri justification for their heinous deeds. If they could not provide (which they never will be also, because a guilty mind is always suspicious and can never strongly support its misdeeds) then I would not kill them but just ask them to sign a document bearing witness that they are all liars and did these out of their deeply rooted hatred of Muslims and Islam. They will also be signing documents that for the rest of their lives they will neither write, draw, speak, think tell others—-do nothing against Islam and Muslims unless there is enough reason to do so. Do not worry, I will do it in front of media, senior lawyers and law enforcement officers. If a Muslim does anything against non-Muslims (especially Jews and Christians), I would do the same thing to him/her.

    How would the reactions be if a drawing would come out depicting Stencher and Piles fucking pregnant Scumella on a cross, while Scumella is shitting profusely and dripping milk from her boobs, then CR comes and opens her cunt on the face of Stencher, enters a cross into Stencher’s asshole and prize up vehemently? Stencher and Piles would see nothing in CR’s blackhole either. Will that be freedom of speech?

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>