Thursday, September 29, 2016   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » New York Times

Jimmy Carter: A Cruel and Unusual Record

27 June 2012 New York Times 3 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

A Cruel and Unusual Record

by Jimmy Carter, New York Times

THE United States is abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights.

Revelations that top officials are targeting people to be assassinated abroad, including American citizens, are only the most recent, disturbing proof of how far our nation’s violation of human rights has extended. This development began after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and has been sanctioned and escalated by bipartisan executive and legislative actions, without dissent from the general public. As a result, our country can no longer speak with moral authority on these critical issues.

While the country has made mistakes in the past, the widespread abuse of human rights over the last decade has been a dramatic change from the past. With leadership from the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in 1948 as “the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” This was a bold and clear commitment that power would no longer serve as a cover to oppress or injure people, and it established equal rights of all people to life, liberty, security of person, equal protection of the law and freedom from torture, arbitrary detention or forced exile.

The declaration has been invoked by human rights activists and the international community to replace most of the world’s dictatorships with democracies and to promote the rule of law in domestic and global affairs. It is disturbing that, instead of strengthening these principles, our government’s counterterrorism policies are now clearly violating at least 10 of the declaration’s 30 articles, including the prohibition against “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Recent legislation has made legal the president’s right to detain a person indefinitely on suspicion of affiliation with terrorist organizations or “associated forces,” a broad, vague power that can be abused without meaningful oversight from the courts or Congress (the law is currently being blocked by a federal judge). This law violates the right to freedom of expression and to be presumed innocent until proved guilty, two other rights enshrined in the declaration.

In addition to American citizens’ being targeted for assassination or indefinite detention, recent laws have canceled the restraints in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to allow unprecedented violations of our rights to privacy through warrantless wiretapping and government mining of our electronic communications. Popular state laws permit detaining individuals because of their appearance, where they worship or with whom they associate.

Despite an arbitrary rule that any man killed by drones is declared an enemy terrorist, the death of nearby innocent women and children is accepted as inevitable. After more than 30 airstrikes on civilian homes this year in Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai has demanded that such attacks end, but the practice continues in areas of Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen that are not in any war zone. We don’t know how many hundreds of innocent civilians have been killed in these attacks, each one approved by the highest authorities in Washington. This would have been unthinkable in previous times.

These policies clearly affect American foreign policy. Top intelligence and military officials, as well as rights defenders in targeted areas, affirm that the great escalation in drone attacks has turned aggrieved families toward terrorist organizations, aroused civilian populations against us and permitted repressive governments to cite such actions to justify their own despotic behavior.

Meanwhile, the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, now houses 169 prisoners. About half have been cleared for release, yet have little prospect of ever obtaining their freedom. American authorities have revealed that, in order to obtain confessions, some of the few being tried (only in military courts) have been tortured by waterboarding more than 100 times or intimidated with semiautomatic weapons, power drills or threats to sexually assault their mothers. Astoundingly, these facts cannot be used as a defense by the accused, because the government claims they occurred under the cover of “national security.” Most of the other prisoners have no prospect of ever being charged or tried either.

At a time when popular revolutions are sweeping the globe, the United States should be strengthening, not weakening, basic rules of law and principles of justice enumerated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But instead of making the world safer, America’s violation of international human rights abets our enemies and alienates our friends.

As concerned citizens, we must persuade Washington to reverse course and regain moral leadership according to international human rights norms that we had officially adopted as our own and cherished throughout the years.

Jimmy Carter, the 39th president, is the founder of the Carter Center and the recipient of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize.

Share/Bookmark




3 Comments »

  1. So why didn’t the Obama adm. address any of this?

  2. I find it interesting that former President Carter would mention the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, when a majority of Islamic countries reject the “Universal Declaration”. Islamic countries created a separate “Cairo Declaration of Human Rights” to get around those parts of the “Universal Declaration” they did not like.So we have one set of “human rights” laws for non-Muslims and separate set of “human rights” laws that Muslims created.I would ask the former President if the “Universal Declaration” is so good why would Muslim countries not want it applied to them?

  3. Hera,
    I find it interesting that any country would support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights considering America broke pretty much all of them when they helped form Israel. Oh wait, that’s right, u wouldn’t know of that. The war of 1948 ring a bell? Well, it all started when Britain, the imperialist empire that it was, decided to give 55% of the land in Palestine to the Jews (B4 the war, 94% of the land was owned by the Palestinians). After a large influx of Jews to Palestine to escape the Holocaust, the Jews increased their numbers to about 30% of the total population). America helped supply them with weapons of mass destruction, trained them, and helped them startegize for war. In 1948, the Jews declared their independence, went into around 60 villages and started massacring Muslims left and right. The neighboring Muslim countries go to aid the Palestinians but lose because they are unable to combat the weaponry supplied by the US.
    IT IS HYPOCRISY, that the US would ask Muslims to sign this treaty when Israel, run by criminal Zionist, is allowed to exist and commit war crimes that violate the most basic human rights. If America wants peace with Muslims they should not support terrorists. Or did you believe everything the media tells you? Ever been overseas? Shame on you for not learning your history.

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>