Monday, April 19, 2021   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » General

A German Judge Bans Judaism, Islam

28 July 2012 General One Comment Email This Post Email This Post

By JOSEF JOFFE (Washington Post)

A Cologne court has decreed that a child’s circumcision is “bodily harm” and thus verboten. Unless the German Bundestag intervenes, which it has pledged to do, about four million Muslims and 100,000-plus Jews will have to practice a central part of their religion in the catacombs of Berlin, Frankfurt and Munich.

It is all God’s fault. “This is my covenant,” He ordered in Genesis 17:10, “which ye shall keep, and thy seed after thee. Every man child among you shall be circumcised.” The original criminal was Abraham, who laid hand on himself—without sterile equipment, let alone novocaine. Then he inflicted the same on his son Isaac on the eighth day after his birth, circa 4,000 years ago.

We are talking about a few millimeters of foreskin, not about female mutilation (clitoris out, labia excised or sewn together). But if you believe the Cologne judge and the chorus of yeah-sayers, this is a “barbaric ritual,” as the children’s ombudswoman of the Social Democrats put it. Matthias Franz, a psychiatrist at the University of Düsseldorf, bemoans “grave genital injuries with psychological and sexual damages down the line.”

Tell that to about six million Jewish men, half a billion Muslim males and about three-quarters of America’s manhood.

The Cologne judge ruled that the “physical integrity” of a baby boy beats religious ritual. Plus: The baby’s unuttered will trumps his parents’ say-so. Hence the state must step in, never mind parental rights or a pillar of faith. If this author’s parents weren’t dead, he would love to sue them for his unwanted tonsillectomy when he was age 5, for we now know that these tissues, a lot more voluminous than a tiny foreskin, are the body’s first defense against pathogens. He would also sue them for various involuntary vaccinations and their painful after-effects.

How about soccer moms who send their boys into the mayhem on the pitch? Or all those ambitious parents, medals dancing before their eyes, who risk the limbs and lives of their offspring on the ski-run, balance beam or show-jumping horse?

Yet this debate is not about facts or faith, as hundreds of letters to the editor testify. One “expert” argues to me that the American practice has nothing to do with health. The intent was “anti-libidinous,” aimed at stopping boys from “masturbating.” Another put circumcision into the same category as Nazi sterilization and forced abortion in China. This is not funny, but serious hatred of things American, Jewish and Muslim.

Leave aside fear and loathing, a large chunk, and you are left with the biggest headache of them all: state versus church in a Europe that is de-Christianizing. The closer the historical tie between throne and altar, as in Germany and Protestant Europe, the more control the state has arrogated unto itself. In Germany, which invented “cuius regio, eius religio” (the ruler’s faith determines his subjects’ faith), the government collects the tithe, mandates religious instruction in public schools, and decides which churches are “established” (Protestants, Catholics and Jews, but not Mormons or Baptists).

Thomas Jefferson’s “wall of separation,” justified by “religion [being] a matter which lies solely between man and his God,” has always been a low fence in Europe. As secularization grew, so did the scope of the state as scourge of superstition and unreason. Hence, the Cologne judge is hardly alone; 45% of German people think he is right. The state trumps both parents and a few thousand years of sanctified practice.The irony of it all is that the state, as represented by the legislature, will have to reverse the judge. The temporal power as savior of the faith is not exactly a liberal’s dream, but neither is the “wall of separation” that now divides Jews and Muslims from the rest.

While the parliament ponders, let the stand-up comics have the stage. A good start is the War of Jenkins’ Ear, fought from 1739 to 1742 over three inches of epidermis and cartilage belonging to Captain Robert Jenkins. His merchant ship was boarded by the Spanish coast guard in the West Indies. In the scuffle, the skipper’s auricle was sliced off. He took it to London as Exhibit A, where a furious Parliament called for retribution. Spain didn’t back down and war ensued, sliding into the War of the Austrian Succession, which embroiled almost all of Europe.

Such a small piece of flesh, and such a big war. If the Cologne judge had known his history, he would have let discretion prevail over secularist rigor. “Live and let snip” might have been the wiser choice. Who wants to tangle with the Man in Heaven above?

Mr. Joffe is editor of Die Zeit, senior fellow of the Institute for International Studies and fellow of the Hoover Institution, both at Stanford University.

Original post: A German Judge Bans Judaism, Islam

One Comment »

  1. You know what also hurts? Booster shots. I bet those four year old children would rather go without them. Guess we should outlaw shots as well

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>