Sunday, May 16, 2021   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » General

An illusion of security

17 August 2012 General 3 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

by Yousef Munayyer (Chicago Tribune)

In seven days this month, at least eight places of worship associated with Middle Easterners or South Asians have been targeted in the United States. A Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wis., was the site of a massacre where six people were murdered. Later that evening a mosque in Joplin, Mo., was burned to the ground. In the following days, mosques were targeted in Rhode Island, Southern California, Oklahoma City and at two sites in Illinois. In Dearborn, Mich., an Arab-American church was targeted with vandalism.

All of this occurs in the wake of continued Islamophobia peddled by some elements of the American right. Sadly, the failure to condemn such hateful rhetoric by mainstream Democratic leaders has allowed it to perpetuate unchecked.

U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., for example, delivered a xenophobic rant last week: “One thing I’m sure of,” he told a town hall meeting, “is that there are people in this country — there is a radical strain of Islam in this country — it’s not just over there — trying to kill Americans every week. It is a real threat, and it is a threat that is much more at home now than it was after 9/11.” He went on, “It’s here. It’s in Elk Grove. It’s in Addison. It’s in Elgin. It’s here.”

Two days later a mosque had pellet-gun rounds fired at its walls. A few days after that a bottle filled with acid was thrown at an Islamic school as students prayed inside. Both of these incidents happened within 15 miles of Walsh’s town hall meeting only days prior.

The events of the past two weeks are cause for alarm. A spike in Islamophobic incidents and an increase in gun violence suggest it is only a matter of time before this occurs again and possibly with significant casualties.

Make no mistake, this is terrorism. What else can we call this pattern of violence targeting and intimidating civilians, leaving them afraid of practicing their most basic right, their freedom to worship?

The University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism maintains a database of terror incidents around the globe. Since 9/11 through the end of 2010 there have been 155 terror incidents in the U.S., and exactly two of them or 1.3 percent have been attributed to international Islamist terror groups. The majority of events are perpetrated by actors with domestic political motivations like anti-abortionists, right-wing extremists, extreme animal rights activists, and extreme environmentalists.

Anders Breivik, who killed scores in Norway last year, taught us a lesson about the folly involved in disproportionately targeting Muslims. The Norway killer apparently was inspired by U.S.-based Islamophobes like right-wing bloggers Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller. The latter’s most recent endeavor is an ad campaign aimed at explaining the Israeli/Palestinian question in terms of overly simplistic and racist dichotomy between the civilized and the savage. Breivik, a disciple of this type of hate, was well-aware that his ethnic background would help him “escape the scrutiny often reserved for young men of Arab descent.” I suppose Wade Michael Page, who massacred the Sikhs in Wisconsin, had a similar confidence.

Despite this empirical reality, a vastly disproportionate focus has been put on the Muslim community in response to terrorism; racial and ethnic profiling has been a feature of this response. From the Bush administration’s Operation Frontline in 2004, in which Muslim-Americans were 1,200 times more likely than others to be interrogated by law enforcement and immigration officials, to the persistent manufacturing of plots by the FBI through the infiltration of mosques by entrapping informants, to the spying on the Muslim community done by the New York Police Department to the Israeli-inspired Transportation Security Administration programs (which have recently led 30 whistleblowers to complain about the use of racial profiling), Muslim-Americans have been disproportionately targeted through counter-terrorism measures.

So why is that?

The answer is simple. Muslim-Americans, a fairly new immigrant group still small in number and not yet cohesively organized, are easy targets. For a government that needs to demonstrate its ability to secure the homeland, the targeting of Muslim-Americans is a low-risk, high-reward option. American’s don’t actually have to be safer, they just need to feel safer, and if the government can get them to feel that way by targeting the “big bad Muslim boogeyman” then so be it.

It is easy to curtail the civil liberties of a minority group but far more difficult to curtail the civil liberties of larger groups. That’s why it is commonplace to see Muslim witch hunts advocated in the wake of an extremely rare domestic terrorist act. Yet, after far more common mass shootings, which seem very common these days, there is no political appetite to further regulate the Second Amendment.

Have post-9/11 policies made us safer from the threat of terrorism? Many might see the disproportionate crackdown on Muslim-Americans and think so, to the government’s liking.

But for the Arab, Muslim and Sikh families whose lives will be irreversibly marked by the tragic events of the past weeks, the answer is a very clear and resounding no.

Yousef Munayyer is executive director of the Jerusalem Fund for Education and Community Development, and the Palestine Center, in Washington.

Original post: An illusion of security


  1. “Make no mistake, this is terrorism. What else can we call this pattern of violence targeting and intimidating civilians, leaving them afraid of practicing their most basic right, their freedom to worship?”

    Does the author realize that this statement could be made in regards to the Copt Christians in Pakistan. I realize Pakistan is not the United States, but Muslims are showing patterns of violence targeting and intimidation civilians and leaving them afraid of practicing their most basic right, their freedom to worship. In fact 900 Christians are being thrown out of their homes by Muslims, with the excuse that their worship services make too much noise. These minor incidents of vandalism do not compare with Muslim atrocities being carried out daily in Islamic countries. Of course, according to Western Muslims, these Eastern Muslims are ignorant and do not know how to properly read the Koran. They are unschooled in their religion, and do not have a proper value system in place as a result of this ignorance. This causes them to follow local customs and kill their daughters and abuse their women which is clearly against the will of Allah and not of the Koranic principals followed by a true Muslim. At some point real Muslims need to open some Madras’s and teach these people how to actually read and interpret the Koran. Maybe then they would not be calling for the burning of 12 year old children.

  2. Pakistan also has a horrendous massacre of shia going on. Talk about freedom of worship.

    More details appearing on the case of the girl – she dropped some books and papers in the dirt. One of them supposedly was a child’s instruction book on the Koran.

    Pakistan is really going down the drain.

  3. Videos of shia being massacred, with background music of jihadi songs, appearing now.

    Strange – there are 3 churches in the area where the girl was accused. Amazing. I used to think that missionary work was done by a few eccentrics, without much effect. I was wrong.

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>