Monday, September 26, 2016   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » General

More Evidence: Obama is a Secret Mooslim

22 September 2012 General 7 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

More Evidence: Obama is a Secret Mooslim

Contrary to widely held assumptions, Muslims revere Jesus and the Virgin  Mary, and both are mentioned extensively in the Qur’an. There is no reason for Muslims to celebrate the denigration of Jesus.

Nevertheless, ignorant loons have decided Obama’s refusal to condemn quarter century old abomination (or is that ObamaNation?), “Piss Christ,” is further evidence he is a “secret Mooslim.”

Heathen President Refuses to Condemn Piece of Art From 1987

by Louis Peitzma, Gawker

Why does Barack Obama hate Christians so much? The notorious anti-Jesus President is refusing to condemn the controversial work Piss Christ by Andres Serrano.

Sure, Piss Christ has been around for 25 years, but it’s returning to New York as part of a retrospective on Serrano’s work. So why hasn’t Obama addressed this outrage? Is it his secret Muslim background? A lack of respect for Jesus? A weird pee thing?

Whatever the cause, we should all be very, very angry. As usual the Fox Nation commenters get it right.

Actually would you expect a mooselim to be offended by disrespect of anything Christian? Hasen’t the Mooslim brotherhood inchief already declared war on Catholicism as well as all Christians & Jews?

… what do you expect from a mooooslim… barry bows to them… he doesn’t care about America, OUR Traditions, and OUR Way of life to include Christianity… which IS what this nation was founded upon along wtih the Founding Fathers basic principles of Liberty… you elect a communist usurper… this is what you get…

Obama is a Mooslime. He will never denounce anything Anti-Christian. I used to give O the benefit of the doubt about being Mooslime but not any more.

It’s truly shocking the way we’ve let our government be infiltrated. But what’s even more unnerving is how long the secret Muslim agenda has been playing out.

Get ready for this bombshell.

Piss Christ was sponsored in part by the National Endowment of the Arts, which means Serrano received money from the U.S. government. And the President when this sacrilege was created in 1987? You guessed it — secret Muslim Ronald Reagan. Who knew?

Share/Bookmark




7 Comments »

  1. This “artwork” pissed off a lot of people and endangered the Natl Endowment, I wonder what happened to it. It’s idiotic, the man did it for the publicity, why give him any.

  2. “This “artwork” pissed off a lot of people” lol. but i’m pretty sure, just like satanic verses, it recieved critical acclaim and won awards.

    “It’s idiotic, the man did it for the publicity” have you ever seen it? i guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. i think it had an extensive tour. it was vandalized in australia or new zealand. you can wiki it. ok i’ll wiki it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ

    “Sister Wendy Beckett, an art critic and Catholic nun, stated in a television interview with Bill Moyers that she regarded the work as not blasphemous but a statement on “what we have done to Christ”: that is, the way contemporary society has come to regard Christ and the values he represents.”

  3. I think what it consists of is a photo, not a jar etc. I don’t think it won awards. I saw pic of the smirking artist.

    Reminds me of that hideous Virgin Mary with elephant turds done by artist starts with O, what a travesty.

  4. There is an old painting by Titian, sacred and profane love. The artwork is presenting the mixture of sacred and profane.

    He probably thought: what’ll get their attention? I know, mix the sacred with the profane.

  5. As a piece of art it displays no unique talent to make it. It took very little time to make it. It can be duplicated by a person as young as 5 or 6. It is hard to say it is art as opposed to simply one man’s opinion on the Christian religion. It should be noted that Christians did not go out and kill in protest of this work. The artist is able to go about his business without fear even though people, including me, condemn the work. I do support, however, his right to make and display his work but I question anyone’s judgment who thinks this is art of any kind.

    As to Islam’s reverence of Jesus. They utterly reject that he is the son of God and thus they label his words in the bible as untrue. Their rejection of him and the belief that he uttered untrue words is equal or exceeds statements made about Mohammad. Basically Islamic beliefs are Blasphemous in regards to Christian beliefs. Of course if you’re a Christian you cannot believe that Mohammad was a prophet which is blasphemous to a Muslim. I guess this is why Muslims feel they can oppress Christians within Islamic lands. Both religions are, by their very nature, exclusive of one another. That does not mean that both religions cannot be tolerant of each other. I do not, however, see this tolerance in any area of the world in which Muslims are in charge of the government. It causes me serious doubts that it is a religion of peace and tolerance. It does, however, seem more tolerant and peaceful if you simply agree with Islam and forgoe your own belief structure.

  6. They revere Jesus as a prophet. In fact, the Qur’an clearly states that he is “favored” among prophets, and they still believe that it is Jesus that will descend on Judgement day. Muhammad is the last prophet, but Jesus is the most important. They do not believe that Jesus’s words were untrue, but instead believe that his words were contorted and corrupted in the years after his ascension by those that would deify him.

    For one thing, your blanket condemnation of all Muslim nations as persecuting Christians is inaccurate. Morocco protects the right to freedom of religion and allows Churches to openly operate without interference despite the fact that it is essentially an Islamic nation. Algeria doesn’t even inquire about religion in surveys, despite Islam being the state religion, and heavily cracked down on the Armed Islamic Group, which was the only case of harassment of non-Muslims. Turkey protects religious freedom in its constitution, and essentially the only case of discrimination are on the individual level, and no more widespread or serious than anti-Muslim suspicions and sentiments in the United States. Religious tolerance has continued despite an Islamist party coming to power. I’ll not go into every single other case, but essentially, the message is that not every Muslim-Majority nation is Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, and not every Muslim is a member of Boko Haram or al-Qaeda. Islam has the misfortune of being predominant in many under developed nations plagued by war, poverty, and lack of education, which will lead to violence and intolerance no matter what religion is in place.

  7. anon,

    piss christ – The piece was a winner of the Southeastern Center for Contemporary Art’s “Awards in the Visual Arts” competition.

    i remember the vigin mary brouhaha. didn’t it come out that the artist was african and that in his tribe elephant dung was considered a good or even sacred thing. him putting it on the painting was menat as a complement, an homage to mary.

    siyaj k’ak

    “and no more widespread or serious than anti-Muslim suspicions and sentiments in the United States.” are you serious? could you imagine what the reaction within turkey would be if jews or christians carried out a 9/11 style attack.

    aaishah,

    as for muslims killing christians, can you disprove any of these attacks?

    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/ChristianAttacks.htm

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>