Monday, September 26, 2016   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » General

Terror delisting the MEK is a cynical sham

24 September 2012 General 7 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

US officials leaked to several news outlets Friday an impending decisionby the Obama administration that it intends to remove the Iranian dissident group Mujahadeen e-Khalq (MEK) from the treasury department’s terror list.

Historically, the group joined together with Islamists to topple the Shah in 1979. But after it assassinated an Iranian president, prime minister and supreme court justice, Ayatollah Khomeini turned on its members and approved the massacre of hundreds of them.

At that point, the MEK set itself the mission of overthrowing the Iranian Islamist regime. It went into exile to France and Saddam Hussein also offered it refuge in Iraq. It is also known for assassinating US diplomats, military personnel and others.

It now claims it has renounced terror and devotes itself to establishing an Iranian democratic form of government that would replace the rule of the Ayatollahs. But former leaders and members of the MEK have noted the ruthlessness and duplicity of the group. They believe that the Iran it envisions would be a dictatorship rather than a democracy. These dissident former members decry the MEK’s slavish worship of its leader Maryam Rajavi in a cult of personality not unlike that of North Korea and other Communist regimes.

The Iranian dissidents have plotted for years to be removed from the terror list. They enlisted numerous Republican and Democratic officialsto lobby on its behalf. Instead of paying lobbying fees to them, it offered honoraria ranging from $10,000-$50,000 per speech to excoriate the US government for its allegedly shabby treatment of the MEK.

Among those who joined the group’s gravy train are former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell, Rudy GiulianiAlan Dershowitz, andformer FBI director Louis Freeh. Many of them profess to have little interest in the money they have collected. Instead, they claim they are sincerely moved by the group’s suffering in Iraq and wish to correct an injustice. I’m sure the money doesn’t hurt.

Analysts writing about the MEK and alienated members reject the group’s claim that it has renounced terror. Seymour Hersh recently published an expose reporting that as late as 2007, US special forces had offered Iranians training at a secret Nevada facility in covert operations. It provided them arms and communications equipment and black ops training for their anti-regime terror activities inside Iran.

A confidential Israeli source who is a former senior minister and IDF officer reported to me that the Mossad has used the MEK over many years, both to leak purported Iranian government documents of questionable provenance and engage in acts of sabotage against key figures in the Iranian regime. My source and other journalists have reported the MEK assassinated four nuclear scientists and caused an explosion that obliterated an Iranian Revolutionary Guard missile base.

Last week, the director of Iran’s nuclear program reported an August explosion disrupted the power lines to the new Fordo uranium enrichment facility. My source says this sabotage was also a product of the Mossad-MEK collaboration.

The US delisting of the group is a sham. The Obama administration isn’t even claiming the MEK has renounced terrorism. If it did, it knows that it’s likely such a statement would rebound should the MEK’s activities become exposed. The chief argument offered in defense of the change of heart is that the group has agreed to relocate from Camp Ashraf, where it’s been a thorn in the side of the Iraqi Shi’ite led government, to a US facility, from which the residents would be relocated to foreign countries.

So, we’re removing a terror group from the list not because it’s stopped being a terror group, but because it’s agreed to leave Iraq, where it had been a destabilizing influence. That’s not a principled position. It’s a position based on pure political calculation.

The MEK is useful in the covert war the US and Israel are waging against Iran’s nuclear program. It is our proxy, much as the Cuban rebels involved in the Bay of Pigs operation served our interests in the fight against Fidel Castro; and the Afghan mujahideen fought a dirty war for us against the Soviets.

In fact, Alan Dershowitz has argued that the MEK should be removed from the treasury list not because it has stopped being terrorist, but because it collaborated with US covert activities inside Iran, meaning that it was serving US interests. Or put more simply: the MEK may be terrorists, but they’re our terrorists.

Read the rest…

Original post: Terror delisting the MEK is a cynical sham

Share/Bookmark




7 Comments »

  1. I’m surprised. Still no mention of the Libyan protesters that opposed the video protests and drove out the Islamist Militias? I would think Islamophobia Today would be all over that.

  2. so let me see if i have this straight. muslims are upset about a group of muslims being taken “off” the terror list? funny.

    siyaj k’ak,

    i think anon posted a link?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-19690444

  3. Right, but the actual site hasn’t actually posted anything. I thought it would serve as a good example of how in Libya the population actually is opposed to radical groups and are here very visibly taking a public stand against them, in order to counter all those that say the Muslim community fails to “speak out” against terrorists, extremists etc (despite multiple condemnations from various Muslim leaders, rulings against terrorism, Iran’s 9/11 vigil, etc).

  4. I am sorry but if they are “our Terrorists” then that means they are “Freedom Fighters”. They are men and women who go behind enemy lines and risk their lives to take down military targets or attack targets to empasize the weakness or faults of our enemy. They live under constant threat of exposure and bravely represent the values of Freedom and Justice in a country that knows neither. They are a symbol of unity and hope to a country and its citizens.

    Terrorists are simply people that sneak into a country to kill or bomb in order to oppress and frighten its citizens.

  5. ccc,

    you can be a freedom fighter and a terrorist at the same time. it is tactics that makes one a terrorist.

    “attack targets to empasize the weakness or faults of our enemy.” like schools? markets. the muslims veiw hezbollah and hamas as freedom fighters. but they are clearly terrorist as well.

  6. Well the answer was tongue in cheek Mike. The status of a person or group is dependent on point of view. Labels simply make people feel better about various events while allowing for seething anger at others.

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>