Tuesday, September 27, 2016   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » Salon

“Indisputable” that U.S. practiced torture after 9/11

17 April 2013 Salon 3 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

guantanamo-sept.-11-trial.jpeg3-620x412

“Indisputable” that U.S. practiced torture after 9/11

BY 

A lengthy independent review found that the country’s highest officials and president condoned torture

While a 6,000-page Senate report on the CIA’s use of extraordinary rendition and enhanced interrogation remains shrouded from public view, a new report released Tuesday by a legal research and advocacy group states, in no uncertain terms, that the U.S. practiced torture in the years following 9/11. As the New York Times noted, the report from the Constitution Project “is the most ambitious independent attempt to date to assess the detention and interrogation programs.” Based on interviews with former American and foreign officials, as well as former detainees, the report investigated the post-9/11 treatment of suspects at at Guantánamo Bay, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and at CIA black sites.

Not only did the task force conclude that U.S. use of torture was “indisputable” but that “the kind of considered and detailed discussions that occurred after 9/11 directly involving a president and his top advisers on the wisdom, propriety and legality of inflicting pain and torment on some detainees in our custody.”

Via the NYT:

Interrogation and abuse at the C.I.A.’s so-called black sites, the Guantánamo Bay prison in Cuba and war-zone detention centers, have been described in considerable detail by the news media and in declassified documents, though the Constitution Project report adds many new details.

It confirms a report by Human Rights Watch that one or more Libyan militants were waterboarded by the C.I.A., challenging the agency’s longtime assertion that only three Al Qaeda prisoners were subjected to the near-drowning technique. It includes a detailed account by Albert J. Shimkus Jr., then a Navy captain who ran a hospital for detainees at the Guantánamo Bay prison, of his own disillusionment when he discovered what he considered to be the unethical mistreatment of prisoners.

But the report’s main significance may be its attempt to assess what the United States government did in the years after 2001 and how it should be judged. The C.I.A. not only waterboarded prisoners, but slammed them into walls, chained them in uncomfortable positions for hours, stripped them of clothing and kept them awake for days on end.

Natasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email nlennard@salon.com.

Share/Bookmark




3 Comments »

  1. What the world needs to realize is that when comparing Islam to the contemporary United States it’s wrong to water board a terrorist but it’s okay to beat a slave girl till she spills the beans on who Aisha might be sleeping with.

  2. “According to the laws laid down by Allah a prisoner may provide information when that captive beleives he has had enough.”

    -Abu Zubaydah (Talking about waterboarding)

  3. What the world needs to know that terrorism has no religion and/or country of domicile.

    Above is an example of how a country passing under the guise of democracy can really be a rogue nation. Breaking every law of decency, civility and principles of mutual respect and compassion.

    It uses its military might to bend rules and to impose its will on all.

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>