Saturday, April 19, 2014   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » Loonwatch.com

Ted Cruz: Christian Dominionism’s Manchurian Candidate

25 October 2013 Loonwatch.com 8 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

Ted_Cruz_Knees_PrayerTed Cruz: Christian Dominionism’s Manchurian Candidate

By Emperor

When Keith Ellison ran for Congress he was incessantly attacked by the Islamophobia industry. For years he was assaulted by hostile Conservative organizations and lobbyists as a “stealth Jihadist.”His victories were viewed as a sign of “creeping Islamization.”

To this very day the fact that he is in Congress is still a sore point that produces all sorts of vitriolic hatred on the Right.

Ironically, the Christian fundamentalists who rant and rave about the phantasm of Muslim fundamentalist takeover of the USA are only projecting their own (hidden) inner desires. It is the Christian Dominionists who have a theology of covertly taking the levers of power and tilting the USA towards theocracy.

In their drive for dominion Dominionists are also extremely anti-Muslim. Texas Senator Ted Cruz, the Christian Dominionist Manchurian candidate, who many slate to be the 2016 GOP presidential candidate recently participated in a rally where one of the participants called on President Obama to “put the Quran down.” Cruz jumped on the anti-Sharia law bandwagon and made the conspiratorial claim that “Shariah law is an enormous problem” in the USA. Sen. Cruz will also be appearing at the rabid anti-Muslim Islamophobe David Horowitz‘s “Restoration Weekend” Conference in November.

Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and other Tea Party members in Congress were the key drivers behind the ugly and embarrassing shutdown of the USA government. Journalist Deborah Caldwell explains the reason and rational of the forces behind this movement and reveals the connection between their theology and future plan for the USA.

Caldwell’s article was written before the deal that prevented the USA from defaulting but its message is very relevant.:

Huffington Post

If the U.S. breaches its debt ceiling this week, bringing with it the global financial panic economists predict, leaders of a little-known far-right movement calledChristian Reconstructionism can claim partial responsibility. Their goal: to eradicate the U.S. government so that a theocratic Christian nation emerges to enforce biblical laws.

That’s right — laws out of the Book of Leviticus prohibiting adultery, homosexuality, and abortion, with penalties including death by stoning.

The key leader of this movement is Gary North, founder of the Institute for Christian Economics in Tyler, Texas. He’s a long-time associate of Ron Paul, intellectual godfather of the Tea Party movement — the very people responsible for Congressional deadlock over the government shutdown and debt ceiling debate.

Paul and North go way back. North served on Paul’s first congressional staff in 1976, and North describes himself as Paul’s “original staff economist.” Earlier this year, Paul announced plans for a curriculum for home schoolers that will teach “biblical” concepts. The director of curriculum development for the program? Gary North.

In an Oct. 4 column in The Tea Party Economist, North describes government default as a “fake threat.” So it can’t be a surprise that the Tea Party caucus isn’t taking government default seriously.

And what of the connection between this group and Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who almost singlehandedly created the government shutdown and debt ceiling crisis?

Cruz is the son of Rafael Cruz, a Texas pastor who directs Purifying Fire Ministries. According to a biography page for the True the Vote summit in April 2013, Rafael Cruz became active in politics during the 1980 presidential campaign, joining theReligious Roundtable, founded in 1979 to involve conservative Christians in politics. “The Religious Roundtable was a Judeo-Christian organization that mobilized millions of Christians all across the United States and helped elect Ronald Reagan,” Cruz said. “It was a precursor of the Tea Party, even before the Moral Majority.”

What to make of all of this? For the last few weeks Tea Party-leaning members of Congress have been described as “kooks” and “crazies” by the Washington establishment, liberals, moderate Republican leaders, and the media.

The name-calling might be satisfying to those who oppose the Tea Party, but it’s entirely untrue. These are people who are patient, determined, deliberate, and rational.

I know this because I spent many years as a reporter covering religion and politics, more than four of them in Texas. So I’ve been watching conservative Christians for a long time, since the era of the late Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority, to the days of Pat Robertson’s early Christian Coalition, and on to the culture wars of the 1990s and early 2000s.

During the years I covered religion, I watched politicking creep into evangelical congregations from New Jersey to Pennsylvania to Texas and beyond. In New Jersey, I interviewed the state coordinator of the Christian Coalition who in those early days revealed to me the movement’s stealth plan to “take over” the Republican Party, “precinct by precinct.”

Later, when I was working in Dallas, I wrote another story, this time about a movement to “take down” the nation’s public schools, promoted by the Alliance for the Separation of School and State, among other groups. As it turns out, Ron Paul was one of the signers of the group’s proclamation to “end government involvement in education.”

Then there were the annual meetings of the Southern Baptist Convention, America’s largest Protestant denomination, which during those years was engaged in an epic battle between conservative and moderate factions. At the time, a group of fundamentalist Southern Baptists had hatched a plan to “take back” the denomination. Over about 25 years, they prevailed.

At one such meeting in the Superdome in New Orleans, a distraught pastor told me he believed something darker than a desire for conservative theology was driving the battle in his denomination, and he handed me a sheaf of papers describing Christian Reconstructionism. He claimed that the fundamentalists wanted to use the denomination as a launching pad to bring down the federal government and usher in a Christian nation ruled by biblical laws.

Was it true? I didn’t know. I kept the file and referred to it occasionally in the following years as I reported on the Religious Right.

Recently, however, I came across a line from North’s book Unholy Spirits that gave me pause. He wrote, “The ideas of the Reconstructionists have penetrated into Protestant circles that for the most part are unaware of the original source of the theological ideas that are beginning to transform them.”

And then there are newsletters stretching back to 1977 on Gary North’s website, describing “guerilla tactics” and “bottom-up theocracy” to achieve Christian Reconstructionism’s goals.

The unifying principle of all these data points: a long-term covert plan of destruction for the Republican Party, the nation’s public schools, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination. And, of course, for the nation itself.

But why? In his 1991 book, Christian Reconstructionism: What It Is, What It Isn’t, North writes, “Reconstructionists… do not believe that the will of the political majority is the final law in society.” They believe that the Bible is.

In order to make their vision of society a reality, they are willing to wait a long time and to engage in politics to make it happen. “We are to work at our callings and wait on the Lord to place us in positions of influence in his time,” according to North’s book.

Once in power, they assert their brand of Christianity: “Christian Reconstructionists further insist that Jesus Christ is Lord of political leaders,” he writes. “All political leaders are directly responsible to Jesus Christ in the discharge of their public office, as well as in their private lives… Practically, this means that political leaders should seek the guidance of Scripture in framing their political positions and programs.”

Interestingly, Reconstructionists don’t seem to care about actually holding onto power in the conventional sense: “The purpose of getting involved in politics, as Reconstructionists see it, is to reduce the power of the State,” according to North’s book.

And they are willing to wait to get what they want. “History is with the Reconstructionists as they advocate a return to God’s law as the standard for righteous living, for the individual in self-government as well as elected officials in civil government,” North writes.

That is what makes the debt ceiling debate so chilling. The Reconstructionists have waited a long time to be in powerful positions. And now that they possess power, they are perfectly willing to use it to “reduce the power of the state” so that the God of the Old Testament can swoop in to rule the Christian nation they believe will result from chaos.

And from where they sit, blowing up the financial system is a pretty good way to make it happen.

Also read:

-The Theology of Government Shutdown

See Video:

Share/Bookmark




8 Comments »

  1. someone ought to tell him to go fuck himself

  2. Lord in Heaven this man is repulsive. Now if only a big piano would fall out of the sky here, or something.

  3. He disgusts me

  4. He disgusts me

  5. Get off your knees bitch!

  6. He wants to be president, yet he’s part of a group that forgets that one of the reasons America was born was to escape from religious persecution. Maybe another country will be born in the same manner again.

  7. Bunch of loons!

  8. Check out “Charisma” magazine online. It is loaded with this stuff. It is kinda scary to realize how many people are gullible or stupid eough to swallow this insanity.

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>