Sunday, September 25, 2016   

  Home     About     Guest Editorials     Advertise     Blog     Site Map     Links     Contact      Subscribe RSS      Subscribe Email  
Home » General

Fox Fears That Ensuring Religious Freedom In The Military Degrades Core Values

25 January 2014 General 8 Comments Email This Post Email This Post

Jasser_Sikhs_Muslims_Army

By MICHELLE LEUNG (Media Matters)

Fox News spread fears that new military instructions that grant commanders the discretion to accommodate service members’ religious practices and physical appearance will threaten the core military values and cohesion of the troops despite the fact that the Pentagon requires these accommodations be made on an individual basis in consideration to the health and safety needs of each unit.

On January 22, the Department of Defense released new instructions on accommodations for religious expression — instructions which they believe will reduce discrimination ”toward those whose religious expressions are less familiar to the command.” The Washington Post reports the new instructions will ensure “rights of religious-minority service members to display their beliefs outwardly — such as wearing a turban, scarf or beard — as long as the practices do not interfere with military discipline, order or readiness.”

On the January 23 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, co-host Brian Kilmeade turned to Fox’s go-to anti-Muslim activist, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser who attacked the rule change as a threat to military readiness. Jasser argued that the rule change might be manipulated by “pseudo-civil rights groups that are really trying to weaken our unit cohesion, weaken mission readiness, and ultimately tee up the football for litigation Jihad or people like — monsters like — Nidal Hasan who want to wear a beard.” Kilmeade agreed, adding “if your religion conflicts with what the rules are in the military, do something else.”

Later in the show, co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck invoked the story of former army officer, Nidal Hasan, convicted of killing 13 people on a military base in Fort Hood, Texas to stoke fears that the new policy might hurt safety and unit cohesion:

HASSELBECK: You can’t help but think, I mean, people are harkening back to Nidal Hasan asking to maintain and grow a beard while a trial was going on. I think it definitely brings up concerns, both for safety, unified front, and just cohesion.

But the new instructions came after a long struggle on the part of religious minority groups like Sikh, Jewish, and Muslim Americans who have previously been barred from serving in the military due to the strict dress and personal appearance standards. The new instructions will allow military departments to accommodate individual religious expression, but each individual will still have to be granted permission from his or her unit to assure that physical appearances “do not interfere with good order and discipline.”

The Washington Post further clarified that these new accommodations will not be allowed to affect safety or military readiness:

According to the Pentagon, requests for such religious accommodation will still be decided on an individual basis but will generally be denied only if the item impairs the safe use of military equipment; poses a health or safety hazard; interferes with wearing a uniform, a helmet or other military gear; or “impairs the accomplishment of the military mission.”

Original post: Fox Fears That Ensuring Religious Freedom In The Military Degrades Core Values

Share/Bookmark




8 Comments »

  1. ‘Brown-haired guy who’s not Steve Doucy’ whats up? You phrase talking points as though they were questions. Haha.

  2. The Pentagon does something reasonable and respectful. Of course Faux is against it. They don’t do reasonable and treat only fellow-righties with respect.

  3. Fox News: the slow kid in the class

  4. I don’t get the problem. Bases had services for all beliefs when I was in the Air Force. Why the big deal now?

  5. I’m sorry, isn’t America the land of freedom? Isn’t the military also supposed to defend our freedom? I guess it seems freedom only matters when it’s in their own hypocritical favors.

  6. People need to stop getting so butt-hurt over religion. If they’re hurting anyone, leave them alone.

  7. Zuhdi Jasser, an Uncle Tom if there ever was one.

  8. Core values such as the first amendment? The First Amendment prohibits the federal government from making a law “respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. It reasonably follows that it should extend to rules passed by departments of the federal government.

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>